It's the same db I used with  1.3.x and it baked everything fine. 
I am now trying to do the same site in 2.1.x but it will not bake the views
for multi_word (single table) named, anything with an underscore cake is
thinking joined relationship tables. (No double plural naming for joined
names either) favorite_posts not favorites_posts
ITS BAKES THE CONTROLLER AND MODEL IT'S ONLY THE VIEW IT SAYS IS MISSING THE
MODEL.....



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Mike Griffin
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 7:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Naming Conventions

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Greg Skerman <[email protected]> wrote:
> yeah i'm an all bake, all the time kinda guy. For most of the tools I 
> write it works beautifully, because business systems tend to be based 
> around CRUD
> - so maybe half my time is spent mapping a schema, then a bit of time 
> mucking around in the scaffold, then build concrete classes and spend 
> the rest of my time writing the small bits of business logic required 
> and making it look nice/doing javascript bits etc.
>
> I'm the stereotypical lazy programmer :P

No harm in that  :)

> Heres an example. Current tool is a job number application form. It 
> has 3 tables, applications, application_questions, application_answers
>
> running up the console right now, i get:
>
> Possible Models based on your current database:
> 1. Application
> 2. ApplicationQuestion
> 3. ApplicationAnswer
> Enter a number from the list above,
> type in the name of another model, or 'q' to exit [q] >
>
> had to do it to prove it to myself (It is Friday afternoon afterall, 
> and I am liable to say stupid things) - but yeah, seems that it copes 
> with underscores correctly - the baked models are not join tables, and 
> the structure is Application hasMany ApplicationQuestion hasMany 
> ApplicationAnswer, which is precisely what I expect it to be (no HABTM 
> in sight).

That's cleared that up for me. I had never tried it out, it was just a hunch
that occured to me when I read it again.

> so either theres a problem with OP's schema, or possibly a custom 
> inflection rule which is seeing "favorite" as plural, or I have no
idea....

Kersacly.

Mike.

--
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials
http://tv.cakephp.org Check out the new CakePHP Questions site
http://ask.cakephp.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected] For more options, visit this group 
cake-php+at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php

-- 
Our newest site for the community: CakePHP Video Tutorials 
http://tv.cakephp.org 
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://ask.cakephp.org and help others 
with their CakePHP related questions.


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected] For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php

Reply via email to