I'm taking the bait:
Looking at the article and the pie chart I have the following observations:
Given that the bottom 8 "frameworks" ("pear" is a framework?) all have a
response of 1.50% (likely one response each) and the intervals between the
other groups (Zend 1 and "none" likely had 2 responses each , etc.) one can
infer that the sample size of the valid responses to the survey was 67 +/-.
Hardly a valid sample size. They conveniently left out this fact from their
article. Any good survey ALWAYS gives the sample size.
What is "sitepoint.com" and what gives them the brass to say their
readership mirrors the "PHP Community" at large?
I have used CakePHP for 5 years and I'm very happy with most aspects. The
changes from 1.3 to 2.x really were a big improvement. I have not begun
looking at 3.0 yet.
I have tired Codeigniter and Symphony 2 briefly but ran back to Cake very
quickly. It fits my thinking.
Also, judging by participation in the Google CakePHP group is not very
valid either. StackOverflow seems to be more active now and the questions
seem to be better.
Ken
--
Like Us on FaceBook https://www.facebook.com/CakePHP
Find us on Twitter http://twitter.com/CakePHP
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
