That I have to agree with, entirely. However the web is growing heavily from the new 'half-computer-literate' generations.
I have build myself a very simple 'page management', where our various clients can simply edit a web 'page' (no concept of articles, news, content_type whatsoever). It's just an on or off page, with minimal admin security. Where it becomes interesting and that's where I see a point in having a good starting point for Cake users, is that when a client wants something more, cake makes my life so easy. Then a user wants something more, it'd be pretty straight forward to add it, or have someone to. The point is they got started with Cake and will keep using it. Anyway, I realize the project I posted above might be too big ... anyways.. my 2c! Seb. On Mar 29, 5:02 am, John David Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 28, 2007, at 12:49 PM, digital spaghetti wrote: > > This is my own personal take, but I don't think CakePHP is in the > same category as Wordpress, Drupal, etc. There is a significant > difference between a CMS and an Application Framework. CakePHP isn't > a content mangement system, though it's pretty easy to create one > using it. > > We're not aiming for end users, we're aiming for developers. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
