On Jul 10, 4:57 pm, "Chris Hartjes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not just lost on framework developers, it's lost on MOST web
> developers. The real question is how much work is it to implement
> something like what you're talking about. It has to be down at such a
> low level in a framework that you probably can't go back after the
> fact and implement such a thing.
>
> Of course, you won't ever share your framework so I'll have to take
> your word for it that it would "overtake the way you write web
> applicaitons".
What the HELL are you basing any of those statements on?
> "It's not just lost on framework developers, it's lost on MOST web
> developers."
On what do you base that?
>Of course, you won't ever share your framework so I'll have to take
>your word for it that it would "overtake the way you write web
>applicaitons".
On what do you base that?
I had reflexive respect for you but it's just been lost by your strict
assumptions from out of nowhere.
> So, until I can see it in action and see the code that goes with it,
> it will remain an interesting edge case to me.
I'm saddened by your lack of imagination. When you read my original
post, you really can't imagine a framework that handles namespaces the
way I describe. And you're a "senior" cakePHP developer? At least I
know what framework to avoid.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
