I kinda see where Luke (and those like him) is coming from. Because RoR has been around for a while, the documentation is easy to follow.
Some people just dive into manual.cakephp.org not realizing that it only scrapes the surface of Cake's functionality. In it's defense, CakePHP is only at ver. 1.2 (pre-beta). For goodness sake (can you believe I typed for goodness cake?) there are complete printed books on RoR. I (like many others) have gotten used to Google, then API, then Manual (in that order) as a source of documentation. A lot of new comers just aren't at that level yet. I must say, when I first started I HATED Cake :). Also note that RoR has a larger team of developers, so they can divide the core coding and documentation. Since the CakePHP team is relatively small, that doesn't happen. Personally, I much prefer the developers working on enhancing the product as apposed to documentation (at least right now). 1.5. After looking at the functionality of other frameworks (on ver. 2+ etc) and CakePHP 1.2 pre-beta, I can only imagine where it will be come version 1.5. Sorry, just my lil' plug. -- Baz L Web Development 2.0 http://WebDevelopment2.com/ On Nov 28, 2007 3:02 PM, rtconner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Luke, Generally I use Bake as a starting point. I bake all my CRUD, > and then customize look and feel and behavior. Rarely do I have a site > that fits square onto a CRUD setup, there are always little behaviors > and things that need fixing up. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
