I agree with Woodsman. But it's a nice to have. I think the goal should be to complete the "manual" 1st.
Chris using your logic, what's the use of the 2 books coming out if 1.2 isn't finalized yet? On Mar 8, 11:04 pm, the_woodsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it would be great if the big name contributors to the group > welcomed ideas more openly! > I also think that a lot of people would benefit from at least an > easily printable form of the book and api - and perhaps the cake devs > don't entirely disagree, seeing as the new cook book has options for > displaying the entire manual in one page. > > Another 'living and breathing document', the wikipedia, thinks people > find a printable version useful too. > > Asking for a DF version of the manual is not asking for the moon on a > stick! > > Just my 0.02, obviously,,, > > On Mar 9, 1:01 am, "Chris Hartjes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Mech7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The API in pdf would be nice too :p > > > A pony to ride would be nice as well, but that's not happening either. > > > The API is likely to change before 1.2 is labeled as being final, so I > > would say providing a PDF of it is a waste. > > > The Cookbook is a "living and breathing document", so again, creating > > a PDF of that would be a waste of time as well. > > > Just my opinion. > > > -- > > Chris Hartjes > > Internet Loudmouth > > Motto for 2008: "Moving from herding elephants to handling snakes..." > > @TheKeyBoard:http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake PHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
