Fantastic, a very positive ending! This was what I wished but didn't expect it would happen. Thanks to villas for creating this thread and thanks to the core team for listening.
@Daniel : blog more! :) zonium On Jun 8, 2:37 pm, villas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Cake Team for reviewing the Blog List so quickly. It seems more > relevant now and that means a better "shop window" for Cake. It's > nice to belong to a community where people can put their differences > aside in favour of what's best for all. Thanks to Nate for taking the > time to take on board the comments, I'm already a regular visitor to > debuggable.com so it will be great to also see him there. > > With RC1 also now on the Cake website, things are looking great! > > On Jun 5, 12:43 pm, villas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > @TommyO > > > The main points are really that (a) the featured blog list should > > contain the best blogs, (b) the community could have some input to > > recommend the ones they like. > > > A featured blog doesn't have to be the "highest" quality, but simply > > amongst the best ones that exist. It is a relative measure. Some of > > the currently featured blogs hardly mention Cake at all, and that > > cannot be right. > > > As with anything else which has been found lacking with Cake, the > > Team will no doubt eventually address it. That's why the project has > > become so good, and why the bloggers have something to write about. > > > On Jun 4, 3:47 pm, TommyO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Seems a lot of people took up this argument for the sake of argument. > > > My two cents does not care about personal relations between the Daniel > > > and the core team. > > > > My opinion is that although prolific,CakeBaker'sposts are NOT "of > > > the highest quality". I often have to tell noobs "don't do it that > > > way" or "that's not true" when they insist on following one of the > > > articles. Sorry, Daniel, but since it's been put out there and the > > > arguments are about people's right to voice... > > > > I'm also of the opinion that good contributions belong in the Bakery, > > > not scattered haphazardly about the net. So blog all you want, but > > > the project shouldn't be obligated to send Blogger Joe traffic to > > > increase his AdSense returns. > > > > My "vote" then is a sound No. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
