As for not knowing how to use the tests, you should really correct that ;) Unit Testing will make your life easier in the long run.
-Mark On Oct 7, 8:47 am, 703designs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Like I said, > > > > Just a thought. > > On Oct 7, 6:03 am, "Marcin Domanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > its not a 'poll' problem. Cake uses tests and include them so people > > can contribute tests , adding another obstacle for them (downloading > > testsuite etc) is not good. Why the tests are a problem for you ? > > can't you rm them if you dont need them ? i can't see where is the > > problem. > > -- > > Marcin Domanskihttp://kabturek.info > > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 6:45 AM, 703designs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Just a thought. You should run a poll of Cake developers (those who > > > develop with Cake, not core developers) and see how many people use > > > these extra parts. Can't hurt to know which "extras" are the most > > > popular. > > > > On Oct 6, 4:18 pm, Yodiaditya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I'm agree with you nate. Actually, i never using testing cause don't know > > >> how to use it. > > >> But, in another cases, testing is needed not only for test your sweet > > >> cake > > >> before product it. But also give us test the cake for bugs... > > > >> On 10/7/08, Nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > The tweet was just me venting my frustration over an unrelated issue, > > >> > I happened to think the timeliness was funny though. > > > >> > Anyway, as far as the "wasted bandwidth" argument, I have to say that > > >> > seems a bit silly. Even the largest of the packages weighs in at less > > >> > than 1.2mb. Anyway, the tests are included for lots of reasons, not > > >> > the least of which being that it helps us as core developers, but also > > >> > the fact that it promotes visibility of testing within the community, > > >> > as well as the ability for people to verify (or more commonly to > > >> > verify the absence of) bugs. > > > >> > On Oct 6, 2:05 pm, 703designs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > Ah, that makes sense. I'm pretty sure that Nate's suggestion was > > >> > > uncalled for, but he's helped me enough with Cake stuff over the last > > >> > > year that I know it's in good spirit. > > > >> > > Here's a question: Why are the tests included? Why not make them a > > >> > > separate download? I mean, yes, if they're distributed together, you > > >> > > know for sure that the test match the framework package. But you guys > > >> > > are certainly wasting bandwidth on the test files. > > > >> > > Thomas > > > >> > > On Oct 6, 1:56 pm, Gwoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > > Test cases account for at least two thirds of the overall package > > >> > > > size. In my opinion, thats a good thing. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
