On Apr 29, 11:22 pm, jacmoe <[email protected]> wrote: > I was maybe a bit too harsh, but Mr. Wadhwani failed to notice that we > are indeed trying to fix the issues, and that this is not borne out of > arrogance. > I understand that he's pissed off, of course. > And that he's letting out some steam.
while the bakery - and the review process - is far from perfect it's worth noting the following (for the unknowing bystanders): The article was titled "Simple Jquery Treeview Helper" It didn't do anything that existing code doesn't already let you do [1] Jayesh did discuss his article with a core member in the irc channel weeks before this post [2] While the article shouldn't have been deleted without a comment to the author (I don't remember, is the deletion of stale articles automatic?) it wasn't destined to be published and Jayesh didn't do anything about the articles shortcoming (which would be difficult since the main problem was surely the tiny nature of the code and that it repeats core - and other - existing functionality) hth AD [1] http://api.cakephp.org/class/html-helper#method-HtmlHelpernestedList (amongst other code solutions) [2] http://irc.cakephp.org/search/cakephp/Wadhwani_J Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
