ADmad: "especially the ones which have almost nil probability of being accepted like yours"
This is what I call arrogance. You have all this time to research my IRC chats. Did you by the way tell me that you were a reviewer on the chat. Nope. Then why should I care what you have to say. If you had told me that you are one of the arrogant reviewers then I would have taken care of this issue at that point. It has nothing to do with my ego. The issue is if you are a reviewer or a moderator then DO YOU JOB or get out. Whether you are doing volunteer work is not relevant. **All** of you core members, reviewers, moderators have all this time to to bash me in a public forum just because I complained that my article was deleted without any comment. But you complain about having shortage of resources for reviewing articles. Accept you all have a serious problem, lose the arrogance. On May 6, 4:30 am, ADmad <[email protected]> wrote: > [1] "from what i see your helper outputs a nested list which can be > achieved with HtmlHelper::nestedList or AD7six's TreeHelper behavior > which has lot more features.. rest is jquery magic not much too do > with cake". (Thanks Andy for digging this up, i had forgotten about > it). As shown I gave you a short but reasonable feedback when you came > to the IRC channel inquiring about the lack of feedback on your > article. So your claim that you didn't get any feedback is plain > wrong, so is this statement in your initial post "I visited the IRC > and other than rude and arrogant answers there was not much help". My > response was neither rude nor arrogant, i was plain and to the point. > There's was no response from you regarding the article itself there > after. You just complained "..the reviewer should put appropriate > comments as feedback" and left the channel. > > No one denies that thebakeryreview/moderation process leaves a lot > to be desired. In a perfect world you should have gotten the feedback > throughbakery'scomments system itself in a timely manner, but we > don't live in one. The reviewers are neither lazy nor arrogant, there > are just not enough of them around to comment on each and every > article submitted (especially the ones which have almost nil > probability of being accepted like yours). This is open source, > everyone contributes their time and effort voluntarily, we can't > impose compulsions on them. > > Also when submitting something to a public forum be ready for > criticism or worse rejection. Your ego will be hurt once in a while, > don't take it personally learn to deal with it. > > [1]http://irc.cakephp.org/logs/link/1450927#message1450937 > > Check out the new CakePHP Questions sitehttp://cakeqs.organd help others with > their CakePHP related questions. > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "CakePHP" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
