> If you > encage your thoughts about who supports what on the server side, you > lost already.
I think thats a bit dramatic. I just want to be able to deploy my cakephp apps to my regular local hosting company (hosting is much more expensive here in australia). Steady improvement is awesome, and not breaking compatability (is handy to. I think the point is thats my requirements. others may differ, but the cake devs have to keep us all happy. my host says this: "There are quite a lot of differences between 5.2 and 5.3, upgrading will break a lot of sites. For that reason it's unlikely at this stage any 5.2 installation will be upgraded unless absolutely necessary, and then it's more likely to have security patches added. Unfortunately our experience has been PHP takes quite a few versions before backwards compatibility is taken seriously, when the time comes where an upgrade won't break things we'll do it. We will be using 5.3 as new servers are added so it will become an option down the track." So no 5.3 for a bit, but probably not years away. Be interesting to know what the plans there are for 5.3 features to be brought in to cake down the track. How different would it be to use? How much difference in terms of features / ease of use would it be, or would it likely be mostly performance increase? But for now, im happy with 1.3, it works really well, is a joy to use and makes me excited to see version 2.0 when it comes, thanks cakephp! will Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with their CakePHP related questions. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CakePHP" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
