HI Jonathan,
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 15:45 , Jonathan Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> On 14 Jan, 2016, at 16:20, moeller0 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I am really curious how cake behaves in that setting...
>
> I have identified a limitation in the current triple-isolation implementation
> - in fact it only works properly if the sources *and* destinations of the
> flows are independent. I’m working on a fix, so that it also works when
> *either* are different.
Ah, good to know, thanks. I am still curious about the non-NAT fairness
by internal IP addresses only performance, as far as I understand that is the
main request/use case people seem to have. We have been offering basically
per-flow fairness for some time now (and that works mostly well), but it leaves
people wishing for a tool to restrict the pain under-controlled bit-torrenting
can have on all users of a given home network…
>
> Turns out that a brand-new, state-of-the-art algorithm has some subtleties to
> it. Who would have thought. :-)
;)
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> - Jonathan Morton
>
_______________________________________________
Cake mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
