Hi Jonathan,

> On Jan 16, 2016, at 10:35 , Jonathan Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 16 Jan, 2016, at 11:05, Jonathan Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> The opposite sense would be to have the side with the smaller number of 
>> hosts govern the system.  This would, I think, handle both the swarm and 
>> shard cases better than the above, so I’ll see if I can think of a way to 
>> adapt the algorithm to do that.
> 
> This turned out to be quite easy, going back to a slightly earlier (and 
> happily simpler) version of the core algorithm.  I did say that the details 
> of incrementing the per-host counters were the major source of subtleties.
> 
> https://github.com/dtaht/sch_cake/commit/2add740a79bb50b04e0497400a501df7b1857f48

        Mmmh, I would assume that for most parts this should work well, and for 
the cornercases where true control seems required there is always dat_host and 
src_host…
Best Regards
        Sebastian

> 
> - Jonathan Morton
> 

_______________________________________________
Cake mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

Reply via email to