Jonathan Morton <[email protected]> writes: > It would be nice if LuCI could infer information about the likely > overheads from the rest of the configuration, and apply (or suggest & > default) the correct keywords in sqm-scripts. That would make the > feature much more widely used.
We can probably do this for the most common cases, but am not so sure it's unambiguous when to pick what. If someone can supply a couple of examples of configuration where we are fairly certain we know what to pick, I can look into how that can be inferred in luci... -Toke _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
