> On 6 Apr, 2017, at 16:51, Luis E. Garcia <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've been doing some testing of Cake on LEDE (WD MyNet 750) and on EdgeOS > (Ubiquity ERPoe). One big question that I have is why does Cake have a > higher/better average throughput than FQ_CoDel? The graph seems a bit > smoother through the speed test. > > The test are against a 10down/2up Mbps connection from a local provider.
The main difference that’s probably responsible for this is Cake’s integrated deficit-mode shaper, which is more accurate on short timescales than the more typical token-bucket shaper that fq_codel is used with. There’s also some difference in the Codel implementation which might or might not be relevant, specifically in the calculation of “count” after a relatively brief exit from dropping state. - Jonathan Morton _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
