Thanks Jonathan, With this explanation it makes sense. Regards, Luis
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 11:06 AM Jonathan Morton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 6 Apr, 2017, at 16:51, Luis E. Garcia <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I've been doing some testing of Cake on LEDE (WD MyNet 750) and on > EdgeOS (Ubiquity ERPoe). One big question that I have is why does Cake have > a higher/better average throughput than FQ_CoDel? The graph seems a bit > smoother through the speed test. > > > > The test are against a 10down/2up Mbps connection from a local provider. > > The main difference that’s probably responsible for this is Cake’s > integrated deficit-mode shaper, which is more accurate on short timescales > than the more typical token-bucket shaper that fq_codel is used with. > > There’s also some difference in the Codel implementation which might or > might not be relevant, specifically in the calculation of “count” after a > relatively brief exit from dropping state. > > - Jonathan Morton > >
_______________________________________________ Cake mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
