On April 11, 2018 8:55:12 PM GMT+02:00, "Jonas Mårtensson" <martensson.jo...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 7:15 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <t...@toke.dk> >wrote: > >> Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> On 11 Apr, 2018, at 6:24 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <t...@toke.dk> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> So, um, did we cram so many features into Cake that it no longer >uses >> >> less CPU? Can anyone confirm these results? >> > >> > To be sure about this, it seems wise to configure Cake to turn off >as >> > many of the new features as possible. That means selecting >"besteffort >> > flows nonat" mode at least. >> > >> > I forget whether simplest.qos correctly uses the built-in shaper >with >> > Cake, rather than just layering it with HTB as usual. If not, then >of >> > course Cake will use more CPU, and we should be grateful that it's >by >> > a relatively small margin (maybe 15%). >> >> It is definitely using Cake as the shaper; in besteffort mode, but >with >> nat and triple-isolation enabled I think. I'll run another test >tomorrow >> with those disabled. > > >Is there any difference between using simplest.qos and >piece_of_cake.qos >when Cake is used as qdisc?
Yes, IIRC simplest.qos with cake as qdisc will use HTB as shaper and cake as leaf qdisc, while piece_of_cake.qos will use cake both as shaper and leaf qdisc. The former is only useful for comparative testing, for actual usage I recommend the later. Best Regards Sebastian > >/Jonas -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake