> On 30 Nov, 2018, at 1:53 pm, Jendaipou Palmei <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> However, we finally noticed that it was the packet size used in our 
> simulations that was affecting the throughput. It was earlier set to 1000 
> bytes, and after making it 1500 bytes (including headers) we note that the 
> throughput is not affected.
> 
> We have uploaded the new graphs on the same wiki link:
> https://github.com/Daipu/COBALT/wiki/Light-Traffic
> 
> We're not sure why packet size is affecting the throughput so largely. Is it 
> the expected behavior?

That particular effect is probably accidental.

Is it possible to also show graphs of the packet marking (or dropping) rate?  
That may be revealing.

 - Jonathan Morton

_______________________________________________
Cake mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

Reply via email to