> On Oct 16, 2021, at 10:54, Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 16 Oct, 2021, at 11:38 am, Sebastian Moeller <moell...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> I also think that some one subscribed should weight in on the exempt one
>> packet from marking, especially in the light of GRO/GSO.
>
> I do have some experience with this from Cake, but Cake has the distinct
> benefit of (usually) knowing what the dequeue rate is, without having to
> estimate it. Without that knowledge, I'm not sure it's profitable to guess -
> except to specifically avoid tail *loss*, which is not at all the same as
> *marking* the last packet.
>
> - Jonathan Morton
Yes, in SQM/cake we opted for making the target >= 1.5 times the transmission
time of a full sized packet, I think that is the correct solution for slow
links, but if one goes the exempt one packet from marking this requires
GSO-splitting at least n slow links, no?
Regards
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
Cake mailing list
Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
