An open question for me: What happens when a GSO packet is marked? Do all the packets get the marking, or just the first?
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 3:17 PM Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 3:10 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <t...@toke.dk> wrote: > > > > Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:44 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <t...@toke.dk> > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> writes: > > >> > > >> > weirdly enough, my gmail account has not received anything from netdev > > >> > since oct 11. > > >> > > >> You're not alone in that: > > >> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20211014112718.6aed7...@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com/T/#t > > > > > > ok. One of these years I'll go back to running my own email server > > > full time. > > > > You can also subscribe to Linux lists by importing the mails from Lore, > > as one of the replies in the thread above pointed out. Been meaning to > > switch to that myself, but haven't gotten around to it yet... > > I attempted to subscribe again, nothing happened. > > figuring out lore... is too much work for today. I'd rather hammer > small things into oblivion on my boat. > > please feel free to pass along my comments and the sce teams findings > into that thread. > > > > > >> > yes, i think fq_codel will be better, and even the proposed > > >> > too-shallow threshold will make for less of a dent on the internet. > > >> > > > >> > still... I do wish I'd seen this earlier. > > >> > > >> Earlier? You forwarded the patch hours after it was posted... > > > > > > I have a daily search for fq_codel, bufferbloat, etc. I have noticed > > > lately that some mailing list traffic from us is being indexed again. > > > I wish I knew why our lists were not indexed by google. > > > > > > Anyway, lacking being on that thread, it's currently impossible to > > > reply. > > > > The Lore page contains instructions for various ways of replying even > > without having the original email message in your mailbox. It's at the > > bottom... > > > > > That said, the l4s fq_codel patch is intrinsically fair, which is > > > vastly superior to the dualpi approach. > > > > Yup, I agree it's better, but I don't like baking in the ECT(1) > > semantics to UAPI. I suggested a filter-based approach which I'm > > currently discussing with Eric on that thread as you might have noticed :) > > > > -Toke > > > > -- > Fixing Starlink's Latencies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9gLo6Xrwgw > > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC -- Fixing Starlink's Latencies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9gLo6Xrwgw Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
