I'd be happy to report, although I've been hesitant since 2.4 is packaged and 3.1 is straight from svn. Is trac the best place to report?
-- Chris Cleeland On Feb 7, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Glyph <gl...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote: > On Feb 7, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Chris Cleeland wrote: > >> Is it possible to turn off memcached support, even with hackery? I am >> running into persistent problems running 2.4 on Debian where, after awhile, >> it appears that memcached gets confused and can no longer find the directory >> for a calendar. I am not running this in an enterprise. It's my home server, >> so while memcached is nice it's not that big of a deal. > > Not currently, no. There are currently some aspects of operation for which > memcached is required. That might change in the future, but it's certainly > never going to change for 2.4 - that's pretty ancient at this point. > >> I'd like to upgrade but have had problems getting 3.1 to run. I don't really >> have a ton of time to fool with it and am a sucky python programmer, so I'm >> content to hack at this one until 3.2 can be packaged by somebody who is way >> more knowledgable than I. > > It'd be great if you could report the problems you've had with upgrading so > that at least there was some record for someone to look at ;). > > -glyph _______________________________________________ calendarserver-users mailing list calendarserver-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/calendarserver-users
