Yes, that's a good place. You probably don't want to try to upgrade straight, especially if you're having problems. Set up a test environment with 2.4 and try to upgrade a copy of your data, don't shut down your running 2.4.
-glyph On Feb 7, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Chris Cleeland wrote: > I'd be happy to report, although I've been hesitant since 2.4 is packaged and > 3.1 is straight from svn. Is trac the best place to report? > > -- > Chris Cleeland > > On Feb 7, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Glyph <gl...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote: > >> On Feb 7, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Chris Cleeland wrote: >> >>> Is it possible to turn off memcached support, even with hackery? I am >>> running into persistent problems running 2.4 on Debian where, after awhile, >>> it appears that memcached gets confused and can no longer find the >>> directory for a calendar. I am not running this in an enterprise. It's my >>> home server, so while memcached is nice it's not that big of a deal. >> >> Not currently, no. There are currently some aspects of operation for which >> memcached is required. That might change in the future, but it's certainly >> never going to change for 2.4 - that's pretty ancient at this point. >> >>> I'd like to upgrade but have had problems getting 3.1 to run. I don't >>> really have a ton of time to fool with it and am a sucky python programmer, >>> so I'm content to hack at this one until 3.2 can be packaged by somebody >>> who is way more knowledgable than I. >> >> It'd be great if you could report the problems you've had with upgrading so >> that at least there was some record for someone to look at ;). >> >> -glyph _______________________________________________ calendarserver-users mailing list calendarserver-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/calendarserver-users
