He was with another Wisp before he switched to us. 
Most of rural Clarksburg is covered by our towers.



From: Kees H 
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 2:04 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [California] CA Meeting Follow Up - AB1665

We hooked James up a few weeks ago.



From: Kristian Hoffmann 
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 11:18 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [California] CA Meeting Follow Up - AB1665

We all need to look at this, and most likely get involved in blocking this 
bill.  If you note their supporting maps, they exclude fixed wireless, so huge 
swaths of CA show as "unserved."

http://www.internetforallnow.org/district_maps_of_unconnected_and_underconnnected_california

https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/cetf/pages/144/attachments/original/1490040674/CETF_Map.jpg?1490040674

Brian, any chance you can ask Assembly Member Cecilia Aguiar-Curry why they're 
excluding fixed wireless providers from their maps?

Here's the content of an email the CETF sent out regarding this bill.  Does 
anyone out there serve Clarksburg?


    Meet James Johas. He and his wife Noel live in Clarksburg, California, 10 
miles south of Sacramento. The Johases do not live in a remote place, yet their 
home—and most of the homes in Clarksburg (population 750)—can’t get high-speed 
Internet because the dominant carriers refuse to serve the area. 

    The results for the Johases are bad. James is a grape farmer with 15 acres 
of Chardonnay and a farm advisor who consults on 2,500+ acres of vineyards. 
When he needs to send product-use reports for his vineyard to the county, he 
can’t do it from his home office. Noel is in a similar boat. She consults for a 
fruit packing company in Lodi. Much of her work requires being up to speed on 
food and worker safety standards, but she can't do her research from home. And 
although their sons are a few years away from homework, not having high-speed 
Internet for their school assignments is of growing concern. 

    Right now, the Johas’ connection is too slow to do anything except send an 
email. They would gladly pay for high-speed Internet, if only they could get it.

    James and Noel Johas represent one of the 420,000 households in California 
on the wrong side of the Digital Divide--unconnected to high-speed Internet 
because of inadequate infrastructure.

    They are also among the thousands of Californians who support the Internet 
For All Now Act (AB 1665), a no-tax bill co-authored by 22 Democrat and 
Republican Assemblymembers that extends a successful infrastructure program of 
the California Public Utilities Commission and that will put pressure on 
Internet service providers to ensure that 98% of Californians have fast service 
within the next five years. AB 1665 is motivated by numerous studies that show 
connecting individuals and businesses to the Internet boosts self-sufficiency 
and economic activity and being offline does the opposite.

    So tell your Legislators every Californian deserves to be connected to the 
digital economy. CLICK HERE 

    The California Emerging Technology Fund provides leadership statewide to 
close the Digital Divide by accelerating broadband deployment and adoption of 
broadband for unserved and underserved communities and disadvantaged 
populations through public policy and community investments.

    California Emerging Technology Fund
    http://www.internetforallnow.org/ 

    -=-=-
    California Emerging Technology Fund · United States 


-Kristian


On 04/27/2017 10:04 AM, Brian - Winters Broadband wrote:

  Assembly Member Cecilia Aguiar-Curry was unable to join us for lunch 
yesterday, but sent the attached slide yesterday morning (came in during our 
meeting) to update us on broadband bills currently being considered in the 
Assembly.

   

  In a call with her yesterday morning, before our meeting when she advised she 
would unable to join us for lunch, she advised she was prepared to meet with 
members of the WISP community if there were issues we want to discuss.

   

  Brian Horn



   


   

_______________________________________________
California mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/california



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
California mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/california



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
California mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/california
_______________________________________________
California mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/california

Reply via email to