"Right now, the Johas’ connection is too slow to do anything except send 
an email. They would gladly pay for high-speed Internet, if only they 
could get it."

That sounds like a statement that needs correcting then.  If James is 
happy with the service and willing to talk, I bet we could get a local 
paper to pick up the story of a local business picking up the slack for 
the "dominant carriers."  Would you be willing to give him a call Kees?

-Kristian


On 05/16/2017 03:17 PM, Robert Andrews wrote:
> So what speed is he getting and does he still think he needs wired?
> Cause if the poster child speaks, somebody is likely to listen...
>
> On 05/16/2017 02:04 PM, Kees H wrote:
>> We hooked James up a few weeks ago.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Kristian Hoffmann
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 16, 2017 11:18 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [California] CA Meeting Follow Up - AB1665
>>
>> We all need to look at this, and most likely get involved in blocking
>> this bill.  If you note their supporting maps, they exclude fixed
>> wireless, so huge swaths of CA show as "unserved."
>>
>> http://www.internetforallnow.org/district_maps_of_unconnected_and_underconnnected_california
>>
>> https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/cetf/pages/144/attachments/original/1490040674/CETF_Map.jpg?1490040674
>>
>> Brian, any chance you can ask Assembly Member Cecilia Aguiar-Curry why
>> they're excluding fixed wireless providers from their maps?
>>
>> Here's the content of an email the CETF sent out regarding this bill.
>> Does anyone out there serve Clarksburg?
>>
>>          Meet James Johas. He and his wife Noel live in Clarksburg,
>>          California, 10 miles south of Sacramento. The Johases do not
>>          live in a remote place, yet their home—and most of the homes in
>>          Clarksburg (population 750)—can’t get high-speed Internet
>>          because the dominant carriers refuse to serve the area.
>>          CampaignMiscImage_1494629934.2248.jpg
>>          The results for the Johases are bad. James is a grape farmer
>>          with 15 acres of Chardonnay and a farm advisor who consults on
>>          2,500+ acres of vineyards. When he needs to send product-use
>>          reports for his vineyard to the county, he can’t do it from his
>>          home office. Noel is in a similar boat. She consults for a fruit
>>          packing company in Lodi. Much of her work requires being up to
>>          speed on food and worker safety standards, but she can't do her
>>          research from home. And although their sons are a few years away
>>          from homework, not having high-speed Internet for their school
>>          assignments is of growing concern.
>>
>>          Right now, the Johas’ connection is too slow to do anything
>>          except send an email. _They would gladly pay for high-speed
>>          Internet, if only they could get it._
>>
>>          *James and Noel Johas represent one of the 420,000 households in
>>          California on the wrong side of the Digital Divide--unconnected
>>          to high-speed Internet because of inadequate infrastructure.**
>>
>>          *They are also among the thousands of Californians who support
>>          the *Internet For All Now Act (AB 1665), a no-tax bill
>>          co-authored by 22 Democrat and Republican Assemblymembers* that
>>          extends a successful infrastructure program of the California
>>          Public Utilities Commission and that will put pressure on
>>          Internet service providers to ensure that 98% of Californians
>>          have fast service within the next five years. AB 1665 is
>>          motivated by numerous studies that show connecting individuals
>>          and businesses to the Internet boosts self-sufficiency and
>>          economic activity and being offline does the opposite.
>>
>>          *So tell your Legislators every Californian deserves to be
>>          connected to the digital economy.**CLICK HERE
>>          
>> <http://www.internetforallnow.org/r?u=http%3A%2F%2Fp2a.co%2FmCoPwQA&e=52d58568a56ee31cd87b31a899098712&utm_source=cetf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=james_johas&n=1>*
>>          //
>>          //The California Emerging Technology Fund provides leadership
>>          statewide to close the Digital Divide by accelerating broadband
>>          deployment and adoption of broadband for unserved and
>>          underserved communities and disadvantaged populations through
>>          public policy and community investments.//
>>
>>          California Emerging Technology Fund
>>          http://www.internetforallnow.org/
>>          
>> <http://www.internetforallnow.org/?e=52d58568a56ee31cd87b31a899098712&utm_source=cetf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=james_johas&n=2>
>>
>>
>>          -=-=-
>>          California Emerging Technology Fund · United States
>>
>>
>> -Kristian
>>
>> On 04/27/2017 10:04 AM, Brian - Winters Broadband wrote:
>>> Assembly Member Cecilia Aguiar-Curry was unable to join us for lunch
>>> yesterday, but sent the attached slide yesterday morning (came in
>>> during our meeting) to update us on broadband bills currently being
>>> considered in the Assembly.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In a call with her yesterday morning, before our meeting when she
>>> advised she would unable to join us for lunch, she advised she was
>>> prepared to meet with members of the WISP community if there were
>>> issues we want to discuss.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Brian Horn
>>>
>>> Winters Broadband
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> California mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/california
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> California mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/california
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> California mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/california
>>
> _______________________________________________
> California mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/california

_______________________________________________
California mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/california

Reply via email to