On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > yeah agree this will not be an Apache release---we planned to continue > w/ precedent of continuous delivery while we sort out ASF related > issues in parallel. would appreciate any other insight to process you > have
How long will this "non Apache releases" go on form your planning? The issues yo mean - is that git@asf? Cheers > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Ross Gardler > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Nov 22, 2011 4:54 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> we were only planning on doing one more release for the year; how do >>> you feel about looking at shipping mid dec? >> >> Apache releases *must* be made from Apache hardware. >> >> Typically the first incubator release from Podlings takes quite a >> while to get approved since it requires a very thorough IP review. Of >> course, if you IP is in very good order to start with this might not >> take so long. >> >> If you plan to do a release in mid-dec it is highly unlikely that it >> will be an Apache release for these two reasons. You need to check >> with [email protected] what the policy is with respect to doing >> releases during the "transition to Apache phase" (note there is >> precedent, Subversion did a non-ASF release from non-ASF hardware >> after it entered incubation). >> >> Ross >> -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
