Thanks Ross! On 2011-12-17, at 1:09 PM, Ross Gardler <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17 December 2011 18:48, Michael Brooks <[email protected]> wrote: >> Can you please briefly explain our stance on signing the Apache CLA for >> contributions to Callback-Docs? > > Documentation that is delivered from ASF hardware and/or as part of a > release is treated the same way as code. What this means is that > significant contributions will require an iCLA. > > The exception to this is documentation that is publicly editable such > as a wiki. However, such documentation cannot be a part of a release. > >> The documentation is a set of markdown files. Some contributions are minor >> edits for accuracy, while other contributions will translate the English >> documentation to another language (extremely large commit that touches or >> creates many files). > > With respect to translations see the access levels defined for (our > brand spanking new) Pootle server: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/translate+pootle+service+auth+levels > > Ross > > > > -- > Ross Gardler (@rgardler) > Programme Leader (Open Development) > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
