Yes, what about binaries? I'm wondering how XHR2 handles that, since it keeps being brought up.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > What about binaries? > > On 6/26/12 11:01 AM, "Dan Silivestru" <dan.silives...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>+1 >> >>Dan Silivestru >>+1 (519)-589-3624 >> >>On 2012-06-26, at 13:58, "gtan...@gmail.com" <gtan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I would vote we should go with XHR2 and polyfill it into the platforms >>>it isn't supported. >>> ------Original Message------ >>> From: Joe Bowser >>> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> ReplyTo: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: XHR2 vs FIleTransfer >>> Sent: Jun 26, 2012 1:39 PM >>> >>> Hey >>> >>> I know that we've been debating this, but I'm wondering if we're >>> abandoning/deprecating FileTransfer in favor for XHR2 and what the >>> pros and cons are. I know that I saw something about Binary Upload, >>> and I agree that it'd be better to do that. Also, there are numerous >>> tickets regarding FileTransfer that people want looked at, and I'm >>> wondering if I should prioritize them for 2.0 or if I should close >>> them and say that XHR2 is the way of the future and that they're >>> welcome to fork this off as a plugin. >>> >>> In short, what are we doing with this? >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry >
