Blob support on mobile is probably spotty at best. Need investigation On 6/26/12 11:10 AM, "gtan...@gmail.com" <gtan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Isn't that what responseBlob is for. It is there on chrome, untested so >assumptions and heresay warnings. >Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry > >-----Original Message----- >From: Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> >Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:07:56 >To: <callback-dev@incubator.apache.org> >Reply-To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: XHR2 vs FIleTransfer > >Yes, what about binaries? I'm wondering how XHR2 handles that, since >it keeps being brought up. > >On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >> What about binaries? >> >> On 6/26/12 11:01 AM, "Dan Silivestru" <dan.silives...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>+1 >>> >>>Dan Silivestru >>>+1 (519)-589-3624 >>> >>>On 2012-06-26, at 13:58, "gtan...@gmail.com" <gtan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I would vote we should go with XHR2 and polyfill it into the platforms >>>>it isn't supported. >>>> ------Original Message------ >>>> From: Joe Bowser >>>> To: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>> ReplyTo: callback-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>> Subject: XHR2 vs FIleTransfer >>>> Sent: Jun 26, 2012 1:39 PM >>>> >>>> Hey >>>> >>>> I know that we've been debating this, but I'm wondering if we're >>>> abandoning/deprecating FileTransfer in favor for XHR2 and what the >>>> pros and cons are. I know that I saw something about Binary Upload, >>>> and I agree that it'd be better to do that. Also, there are numerous >>>> tickets regarding FileTransfer that people want looked at, and I'm >>>> wondering if I should prioritize them for 2.0 or if I should close >>>> them and say that XHR2 is the way of the future and that they're >>>> welcome to fork this off as a plugin. >>>> >>>> In short, what are we doing with this? >>>> >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry >>
