There would be the whole business of signing the individual archives as well (easy). I figure the release would look like the src folder that coho used to make http://people.apache.org/~steven/cordova-1.9.0-src/. We should figure out if we want to also include cordovajs repo in the source.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > From my understanding it would literally bit a git archive of a tag of > the repo w/ no rejigging. (And Coho becomes a tool for distribution > authors like PhoneGap, AppMobi, etc.) > > Jukka/Ross: is that assumption correct? > > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: > > iOS should be good to go regarding "source only", the docs have been > > updated regarding command-line install. > > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd like for us to aim to cut an Apache Cordova release. The idea > >> we're bouncing now is that our Apache releases are source only > >> packages and we save the binary releases for downstream projects (like > >> that phonegap thing you may have heard of). This should decouple > >> release woe, aka coho, from the framework authoring concerns. > >> > >> Our next apache board report is dues Sept 5th --- and having a release > >> ready to go for that date would be admirable but maybe too soon? > >> > >> (We have in the past tended to hold off until end of September for the > >> next point release after our last sprint.) > >> > >> This would give us the final checkmarks to achieve TLP status which > >> would be cool to do for our one year Apache incubation anniversary. =) >
