- I think we should include the directories of the implementations instead of more .zip files, at the top level - remove all references to PhoneGap from the README. don't need the phonegap mailing list link. That would go in the phonegap dist :) - I would also remove the names of the developers in the change log - the wiki link to cordova is wrong in the read me
Other than that I think it's good! On 8/28/12 5:47 PM, "Steven Gill" <[email protected]> wrote: >So I have done some work on coho on the src branch in the apache repo. I >have uploaded 2.1.0rc1 release onto my apache page over at >http://people.apache.org/~steven/. The readme needs some work still and I >have to update my tests for Coho. Anyone see any problems with this >release? > > > >On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Steven Gill <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Definitely doable. Only thing I have run into so far is that minor issue >> with git archive. >> >> If I do >> >> git archive --format zip -o incubator-cordova-android.zip 2.1.0rc1 >> This will archive based on the 2.1.0rc1 tag. Problem is, some of these >> repos don't get tagged currently. Specifically, qt, mac, mobile-spec. >>This >> causes the git archive command to fail. We need to make sure we are >>tagging >> those repos and have a VERSION file in the root of those repos. >> >> Alternatively, I could add a check to see if a VERSION file is present >>and >> updated to the current tag. If not, I could do a git archive --format >>zip >> -o incubator-cordova-android.zip HEAD. >> >> Other than this issue, I have an updated version of Coho on my machine >> that pulls those repos, adds the readme and disclaimer files, zips + >>signs >> them. Plan is to have 2.1 be an official apache release. >> >> -Steve >> >> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yep a git archive of the tag is all we need. Top-level >>> license/notice/disclaimer files as Steve already has in his example. >>> >>> Definitely need cordova-js + the docs in there. Weinre, dunno, Pat >>>says no >>> so that sounds good. What about the hello world app? Don't think the >>>labs >>> repo should go in there either. >>> >>> As I see it we need to: >>> >>> - add a git archive of each repo into a directory at top-level of >>> distribution, so we would have: >>> * android >>> * app-hello-world >>> * bada-wac >>> * bada >>> * blackberry >>> * docs >>> * iOS >>> * js >>> * mac >>> * mobile-spec >>> * qt >>> * tizen >>> * webos >>> * wp7 >>> - likely add a README file at the top explaining what each directory is >>> and that you should package mobile-spec into an app built from each >>> platform to "run" the tests. >>> >>> Sign it. That's it. If not doable for 2.1 then definitely for 2.2. >>> >>> >>> On 8/16/12 8:14 PM, "Patrick Mueller" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Yes should be all repos (even the less exciting ones) in src form. >>> >> Ideally, a distribution of Cordova would use a Cordova src release >>>to >>> >> package itself. >>> >> >>> > >>> >I was planning on weinre being a separate release from the rest of >>> >Cordova. >>> > ie, incubator-cordova-weinre WOULD NOT be part of the Cordova >>>release. >>> >Am >>> >waiting for Cordova to go gold before weinre :-) >>> > >>> >-- >>> >Patrick Mueller >>> >http://muellerware.org >>> >>> >>
