Yup, it would be awesome. I talked to Google Developer Advocate - David Chandler, about the very thing this morning.
Simon Mac Donald http://hi.im/simonmacdonald On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah size is the biggest problem. But it would be so cool to have an up to > date version of Chrome/Webkit wouldn't it ? I say we should look into it. > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Simon MacDonald > <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > That's almost a non-starter then as the APK is limited to 50 megs with > > optional 2 x 2 GB expansion files. Basically we'd be limiting most apps > to > > 10 megs which seems like a lot until you start including images and > audio. > > > > Simon Mac Donald > > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org > > >wrote: > > > > > It's definitely an option, but it would severely bloat apps. It would > > > basically mean shipping a copy of chrome with each app. The number I've > > > heard is that it adds about 40 megs. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hey > > > > > > > > I was looking at the Android Chromium Build, and I saw the Content > > Shell. > > > > > > > > http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/AndroidBuildInstructions > > > > http://www.chromium.org/developers/content-module > > > > > > > > This looks interesting, and I'm wondering if it makes sense to use > > > > this for new implementations of Cordova, or at least if it's good > > > > enough for a proof-of-concept. Are there any Chrome people that know > > > > more about this thing? > > > > > > > > Joe > > > > > > > > > >
