The exploration is fully worth the effort ---thought a build only weighed in at 20mb too which while not ideal still possible.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Simon MacDonald <simon.macdon...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yup, it would be awesome. I talked to Google Developer Advocate - David > Chandler, about the very thing this morning. > > Simon Mac Donald > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yeah size is the biggest problem. But it would be so cool to have an up to >> date version of Chrome/Webkit wouldn't it ? I say we should look into it. >> >> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Simon MacDonald >> <simon.macdon...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> > That's almost a non-starter then as the APK is limited to 50 megs with >> > optional 2 x 2 GB expansion files. Basically we'd be limiting most apps >> to >> > 10 megs which seems like a lot until you start including images and >> audio. >> > >> > Simon Mac Donald >> > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org >> > >wrote: >> > >> > > It's definitely an option, but it would severely bloat apps. It would >> > > basically mean shipping a copy of chrome with each app. The number I've >> > > heard is that it adds about 40 megs. >> > > >> > > >> > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hey >> > > > >> > > > I was looking at the Android Chromium Build, and I saw the Content >> > Shell. >> > > > >> > > > http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/AndroidBuildInstructions >> > > > http://www.chromium.org/developers/content-module >> > > > >> > > > This looks interesting, and I'm wondering if it makes sense to use >> > > > this for new implementations of Cordova, or at least if it's good >> > > > enough for a proof-of-concept. Are there any Chrome people that know >> > > > more about this thing? >> > > > >> > > > Joe >> > > > >> > > >> > >>
