+1 for 2.1
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Mike Reinstein <reinstein.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2.1 IS wild...seriously, can't wait for the release. :) > > -Mike > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 to ASAP >> >> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Jesse MacFadyen <purplecabb...@gmail.com >> >wrote: >> >> > ASAP I think. >> > Immediately after 2.1 is wild. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Jesse >> > >> > >> > On 2012-09-07, at 11:15 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> > >> > > Well, want to point out if we ship 2.1 src (w/ official process and >> > > vote) the only additional step is another vote thread specifying >> > > whether we feel we're ready for graduating. (Which is why I'm thinking >> > > doing it sooner isn't a big deal.) >> > > >> > > >> > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >> > >> 2.1 is probably cutting it too close. >> > >> >> > >> Around the time of 2.2 more realistic? >> > >> >> > >> On 9/7/12 10:34 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> Hi guys, we are close to being ready to engage the graduation process >> > >>> and become a top level project. [1] Ross suggested we set a date and >> I >> > >>> agree. The next board report isn't due until November but that >> doesn't >> > >>> mean we cant' do thing sooner. My preference would be mid-september >> > >>> (after we ship 2.1) but maybe thats too soon. >> > >>> >> > >>> Thoughts? >> > >>> >> > >>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#toplevel >> > >> >> > >>