I have got a draft of the charter ready to be viewed. Take a look at [1] There are still some people who have been voted in and haven't gotten their apache id's. I have sent emails about them in the original vote threads. If you are a committer and are not on the charter list, let us know. I have also updated our committer list at [2]. If you are missing from that list, just shoot me an email or look at our wiki on how to update it yourself.
According to the charter, we need to appoint a Vice President for Cordova. I assume this would just be a nomination process with a vote unless there is lazy consensus. We can change the person appointed at any time in the future. After that, I believe we are ready to get a recommendation from our mentors for graduation. [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/Draft%20Charter [2] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/callback.html -Steve On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: > This sounds great! I will start work on the charter. Definitely for > lazy consensus approach. > > Thanks Ross! > > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Michael Brooks > <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca>wrote: > >> > >> > I suggest that you assume lazy consensus within the community and get on >> > with writing the charter. >> >> >> +1 lazy consensus :) >> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com >> >wrote: >> >> > On 4 October 2012 12:20, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> > > Ross, what are the next steps for us to do for graduation >> > > then---a vote? >> > >> > Agreement by the community and your mentors that you are ready to >> > graduate is needed. This can be a formal vote or can be a lazy >> > consensus thing. You have two mentors (that I recall) saying you are >> > ready and I see noone in the community objecting. I suggest that you >> > assume lazy consensus within the community and get on with writing the >> > charter. There is more information on how in >> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-resolution >> > >> > After that you ask the IPMC to vote to recommend you to graduate (I >> > suggest you also use this as a last chance for the community to raise >> > any objections since I'm suggesting missing a formal community vote - >> > however if anyone has any objections they can do so now or during the >> > charter drafting). >> > >> > Once the IPMC vote has concluded you submit the charter to the board >> > and your (barring unexpected issues) done. >> > >> > Ross >> > >> > > >> > > [1] http://hc.apache.org/charter.html >> > > >> > > >> > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Ross Gardler < >> rgard...@opendirective.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> The charter is an resolution that the Board votes on to create the >> > >> TLP. For example: >> > >> >> > >> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> > >> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> > >> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> > >> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> > >> open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public, >> > >> related to a widgets-based, web-and-social mashup platform. >> > >> >> > >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management >> > >> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Rave Project", >> > >> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the >> > >> Foundation; and be it further >> > >> >> > >> RESOLVED, that the Apache Rave Project be and hereby is >> > >> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software >> > >> related to a widgets-based, web-and-social mashup platform; >> > >> and be it further >> > >> >> > >> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Rave" be >> > >> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to >> > >> serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair >> > >> of the Apache Rave Project, and to have primary responsibility >> > >> for management of the projects within the scope of >> > >> responsibility of the Apache Rave Project; and be it further >> > >> >> > >> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >> > >> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >> > >> Apache Rave Project: >> > >> >> > >> * Ard Schrijvers <a...@apache.org> >> > >> * Ate Douma <a...@apache.org> >> > >> * Bas Zoetekouw <b...@apache.org> >> > >> * Gerald Guo <zh...@apache.org> >> > >> * Hadrian Zbarcea <hadr...@apache.org> >> > >> * Jasha Joachimsthal <ja...@apache.org> >> > >> * Jesse Ciancetta <jc...@apache.org> >> > >> * Joost van Dijk <joostvand...@apache.org> >> > >> * Maarten Kremers <mkrem...@apache.org> >> > >> * Marlon Pierce <mpie...@apache.org> >> > >> * Matt Franklin <mfrank...@apache.org> >> > >> * Niels van Dijk <cthi...@apache.org> >> > >> * Okke Harsta <ohar...@apache.org> >> > >> * Raminder Singh <ramin...@apache.org> >> > >> * Ross Gardler <rgard...@apache.org> >> > >> * Sander van der Waal <svanderw...@apache.org> >> > >> * Scott Wilson <scot...@apache.org> >> > >> * Sean Cooper <secoo...@apache.org> >> > >> * Suresh Marru <sma...@apache.org> >> > >> * Tony Carlucci <carlu...@apache.org> >> > >> * Unico Hommes <un...@apache.org> >> > >> * Venkat Mahadevan <venk...@apache.org> >> > >> * Woonsan Ko <woon...@apache.org> >> > >> >> > >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Matt Franklin >> > >> be appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache Rave, to >> > >> serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the >> > >> Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until >> > >> death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, >> > >> or until a successor is appointed; and be it further >> > >> >> > >> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Rave PMC be and hereby is >> > >> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to >> > >> encourage open development and increased participation in the >> > >> Apache Rave Project; and be it further >> > >> >> > >> RESOLVED, that the Apache Rave Project be and hereby >> > >> is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache >> > >> Incubator Rave podling; and be it further >> > >> >> > >> RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache >> > >> Incubator Rave podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator >> > >> Project are hereafter discharged. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On 4 October 2012 11:50, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> > >>> We do not have a formal charter. I started something in the wiki [1] >> > >>> drawing on some of the content from our proposal [2]. >> > >>> >> > >>> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/Draft%20Charter >> > >>> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CallbackProposal >> > >>> >> > >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com >> > >> > wrote: >> > >>>> I want to bump this thread up and get the graduation process >> started. >> > We >> > >>>> have released 2.1 as the first official release for Apache Cordova. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Looking at the link Jukka posted ( >> > >>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#process) >> > >>>> >> > >>>> There are a few steps left till graduation: >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> - a charter for your project >> > >>>> - a positive community graduation >> > >>>> VOTE<http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> >> > >>>> - a positive IPMC recommendation >> > >>>> VOTE<http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> >> > >>>> - the acceptance of the >> > >>>> resolution< >> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-resolution> >> > >>>> by >> > >>>> the Board >> > >>>> >> > >>>> I am not sure if we have a charter. Anyone have any details on >> this? >> > >>>> >> > >>>> We can start a vote thread, but I am wondering if we need to have >> the >> > >>>> charter before we start it. >> > >>>> >> > >>>> -Steve >> > >>>> >> > >>>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Michael Brooks < >> > mikeywbro...@gmail.com>wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >>>>> +1 for 2.1 >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> On 2012-09-07, at 12:14 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > Well, want to point out if we ship 2.1 src (w/ official process >> and >> > >>>>> > vote) the only additional step is another vote thread specifying >> > >>>>> > whether we feel we're ready for graduating. (Which is why I'm >> > thinking >> > >>>>> > doing it sooner isn't a big deal.) >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> >> wrote: >> > >>>>> >> 2.1 is probably cutting it too close. >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> Around the time of 2.2 more realistic? >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> On 9/7/12 10:34 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >>> Hi guys, we are close to being ready to engage the graduation >> > process >> > >>>>> >>> and become a top level project. [1] Ross suggested we set a >> date >> > and I >> > >>>>> >>> agree. The next board report isn't due until November but that >> > doesn't >> > >>>>> >>> mean we cant' do thing sooner. My preference would be >> > mid-september >> > >>>>> >>> (after we ship 2.1) but maybe thats too soon. >> > >>>>> >>> >> > >>>>> >>> Thoughts? >> > >>>>> >>> >> > >>>>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#toplevel >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Ross Gardler (@rgardler) >> > >> Programme Leader (Open Development) >> > >> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Ross Gardler (@rgardler) >> > Programme Leader (Open Development) >> > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com >> > >> > >
