Funny, I never got that update. On Sep 17, 2012 5:34 PM, "Anis KADRI" <anis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Talking about the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > That was last year and Samsung has updated them to 4.0.3 :-) > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Brion Vibber <bvib...@wikimedia.org> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > I would not mind dropping 2.1; our apps for Wikipedia have been 2.2+ > >> anyway > >> > due to breakages in the 2.1 browser. > >> > > >> > 3/3.2 would be slightly sad to miss only because there are Honeycomb > >> > tablets that haven't received ICS updates, including my Galaxy Tab > 10.1 > >> but > >> > ... let's be honest there's not a lot of them out there. I'm not sure > >> how > >> > to blacklist those particular versions in the AndroidManifest however > >> while > >> > still being compatible with 2.2/2.3... > >> > > >> > >> That's a very good point. I'm almost convinced that the 3.1 on > >> Google's dashboard is literally the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 devices > >> that Google gave away at IO a couple of years ago that were pretty > >> much orphaned by Samsung because they had a broken build. > >> > >> By far, Honeycomb was probably the worst version of Android ever, and > >> I've been using it since 1.0 and remember how bad 2.0 was when it > >> first came out on the Droid/Milestone. We can't even deprecate it > >> cleanly. > >> > > > > >
