Me either. My Galaxy 10.1 Tab is still running 3.1. Simon Mac Donald http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > Funny, I never got that update. > On Sep 17, 2012 5:34 PM, "Anis KADRI" <anis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Talking about the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 >> >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > That was last year and Samsung has updated them to 4.0.3 :-) >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Brion Vibber <bvib...@wikimedia.org> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > I would not mind dropping 2.1; our apps for Wikipedia have been 2.2+ >> >> anyway >> >> > due to breakages in the 2.1 browser. >> >> > >> >> > 3/3.2 would be slightly sad to miss only because there are Honeycomb >> >> > tablets that haven't received ICS updates, including my Galaxy Tab >> 10.1 >> >> but >> >> > ... let's be honest there's not a lot of them out there. I'm not sure >> >> how >> >> > to blacklist those particular versions in the AndroidManifest however >> >> while >> >> > still being compatible with 2.2/2.3... >> >> > >> >> >> >> That's a very good point. I'm almost convinced that the 3.1 on >> >> Google's dashboard is literally the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 devices >> >> that Google gave away at IO a couple of years ago that were pretty >> >> much orphaned by Samsung because they had a broken build. >> >> >> >> By far, Honeycomb was probably the worst version of Android ever, and >> >> I've been using it since 1.0 and remember how bad 2.0 was when it >> >> first came out on the Droid/Milestone. We can't even deprecate it >> >> cleanly. >> >> >> > >> > >>
