iOS these have been fixed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600
I'm fixing this one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502 This one will be left, don't know if we can fix it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603 I will be updating the version numbers, template etc as well. On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > On the Android side: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1606 (updating core plugins to > extend CordovaPlugin instead of Plugin) > > Update iOS list with already fixed ones gone: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600 > > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.be...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> And 1563 is a dup of 902. >> I'm confused about what the problem is with 1604 (I posted a comment) >> And think that the following are also important: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502 - We need and updated image >> - does Adobe have a designer to work on that? >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600 >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Bugs that I'd like to see fixed before the RC: >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603 >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604 >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1570 >> > >> > 1570 is already marked closed? >> > >> > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1563 >> > > >> > > We should be able to fix these over the next couple of days though. >> Want >> > to >> > > aim for cutting the RC Thursday? >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Agree that tagging 2.2.0rc1 is the right thing to do at this point. >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.be...@gmail.com >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > I think we have a pretty good handle on the iOS 6 bugs. Most of >> the >> > > ones >> > > > > reported recently have already been fixed and committed. I would >> > push >> > > > for >> > > > > a release candidate this week so we can start focusing on testing >> and >> > > bug >> > > > > fixes rather than continue to add more features and optimizations. >> > I >> > > > > think once we have a release candidate we will get more feedback >> from >> > > > users >> > > > > who are not comfortable taking an edge build. This will get us more >> > > real >> > > > > world iOS 6 testing. >> > > > > >> > > > > -becky >> > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Giorgio Natili < >> > g.nat...@gnstudio.com >> > > > > >wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Because has been said that some (or most) iOS 6 issues will be >> not >> > > part >> > > > > of >> > > > > > it... >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On 10/8/12 9:03 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >Why do you feel that this release wouldn't be a stable release? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Giorgio Natili < >> > > > g.nat...@gnstudio.com> >> > > > > > >wrote: >> > > > > > >> Just my 2 cents but you don't think is better to wait 2 weeks >> > more >> > > > and >> > > > > > >> have a pretty stable one? >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> Giorgio >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> On 10/3/12 7:56 PM, "Simon MacDonald" < >> > simon.macdon...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >>>I think we are looking good for 2.2.0 on Android. It will >> mostly >> > > be >> > > > a >> > > > > > >>>bug fix/performance release for us. I suspect we'll need until >> > > 2.3.0 >> > > > > > >>>to get all the Camera code sorted. >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>>Simon Mac Donald >> > > > > > >>>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>>On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Bryce Curtis < >> > > > curtis.br...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > >>>wrote: >> > > > > > >>>> It sounds like resolving iOS6 issues will drive when 2.2.0 >> can >> > > be >> > > > > > >>>> tagged. What is the readiness of the other platforms so we >> > can >> > > > > have a >> > > > > > >>>> 2.2 release when iOS is ready? Does it sound reasonable to >> > have >> > > a >> > > > > > >>>> release candidate in a week or so, then give a couple of >> weeks >> > > of >> > > > > > >>>> testing before tagging 2.2? >> > > > > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>> If you folks see benefit for the iOS implementation, then >> I'm >> > > for >> > > > > > >>>>>waiting. >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> On 10/2/12 8:48 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agri...@chromium.org> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>I was thinking the same thing. We still have new >> iOS6-related >> > > > bugs >> > > > > > >>>>>>being >> > > > > > >>>>>>reported, so it might make sense to give this more time. >> > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Becky Gibson >> > > > > > >>>>>><gibson.be...@gmail.com>wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> So, where do we stand on this? I think working towards >> 2.2 >> > > > > sooner >> > > > > > >>>>>>>rather >> > > > > > >>>>>>> than later would be the best solution since there appear >> to >> > > be >> > > > > many >> > > > > > >>>>>>>issues >> > > > > > >>>>>>> with cutting a point release. Where do the other >> platforms >> > > > stand >> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrt >> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.2? >> > > > > > >>>>>>> What more needs to be done? >> > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> -becky >> > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Michal Mocny < >> > > > > mmo...@chromium.org >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > Nevermind, I'm not able to repro the report. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Michal Mocny >> > > > > > >>>>>>><mmo...@chromium.org> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > someone just reported an issue with FileWriter on >> ios6 >> > ( >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1559) >> similar >> > > to >> > > > a >> > > > > > >>>>>>>FileReader >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > issue I fixed a few weeks back. Fix is likely easy, >> > just >> > > > > > >>>>>>>taking >> > > > > > >>>>>>>a >> > > > > > >>>>>>>look >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > right now to confirm and see if any other things need >> > > > fixing. >> > > > > > >>>>>>>Should >> > > > > > >>>>>>> be >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > solved today. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Andrew Grieve >> > > > > > >>>>>>><agri...@chromium.org >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> The main fixes we'll need are: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Patrick Mueller [ios] route console >> methods >> > > to >> > > > > > >>>>>>>original >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> console commit >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> | commitdiff | tree | snapshot >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Patrick Mueller [ios] route console >> methods >> > > to >> > > > > > >>>>>>>original >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> console commit >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> | commitdiff | tree | snapshot >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Change default bridge >> > > from >> > > > > > >>>>>>> XHR_NO_PAYLOAD >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> to... commit | commitdiff | tree | snapshot >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Attempt to fix a >> crash >> > in >> > > > iOS >> > > > > > >>>>>>>XHR >> > > > > > >>>>>>> bridge >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> mode. commit | commitdiff | tree | snapshot >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Fix XHR exec bridge >> not >> > > > > working >> > > > > > >>>>>>>for >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> non-file... commit | commitdiff | tree | snapsho >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> However, there were also extra params added to >> > > > FileTransfer >> > > > > > >>>>>>>that >> > > > > > >>>>>>>will >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > also >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> need to be included to avoid a JS/Native mismatch. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> There looks to be some Globalization plugin JS >> commits >> > > as >> > > > > > >>>>>>>well, >> > > > > > >>>>>>>but I >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> haven't followed whether those will cause issues if >> > left >> > > > > out. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Michael Brooks < >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > mich...@michaelbrooks.ca >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > When we decide to roll 2.1.1, we should use JIRA >> to >> > > > track >> > > > > > >>>>>>>the >> > > > > > >>>>>>> release. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > Unfortunately, that means JIRA spam... >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Filip Maj < >> > > > f...@adobe.com >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > iOS folks: are there any commits needed newer >> than >> > > the >> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.0 >> > > > > > >>>>>>>tag >> > > > > > >>>>>>> in >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> the >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > JS >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > for any critical fixes? >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > On 9/27/12 3:40 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen" >> > > > > > >>>>>>><purplecabb...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Just iOS afaik >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Cheers, >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > Jesse >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Sent from my iPhone6 >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >On 2012-09-27, at 3:36 PM, Filip Maj < >> > > f...@adobe.com> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> So which platforms are we fixing horrible >> bugs >> > > for >> > > > in >> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.1? >> > > > > > >>>>>>> WP7 >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > + >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > iOS? >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> Basically: do any of the failing platforms >> that >> > > > > > >>>>>>>_require_ >> > > > > > >>>>>>>fixes >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> need >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > any >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> JS fixes? >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> On 9/27/12 3:32 PM, "Jesse" < >> > > > purplecabb...@gmail.com >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> Where / When are we tagging cordova-js ? >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Jesse >> > MacFadyen >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Not disagreeing. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Cheers, >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Jesse >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Sent from my iPhone6 >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> On 2012-09-27, at 2:31 AM, Brian LeRoux < >> > > > > b...@brian.io> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> One click builds are not just for CI! Hand >> > > > rolling >> > > > > > >>>>>>>always >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > error >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>prone, >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> and >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> time consuming repatative business like >> that >> > > is >> > > > a >> > > > > > >>>>>>>job >> > > > > > >>>>>>>for a >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> robot. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>You >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> then >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> can focus on code, and others can see (and >> > > > > therefor >> > > > > > >>>>>>>improve >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> upon) >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> release >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> packaging. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> Regardless of all those benefits we want >> to >> > > get >> > > > > to a >> > > > > > >>>>>>>CI >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > future. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> (recommended reading on this, and more: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> >> > http://pragprog.com/the-pragmatic-programmer) >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> On Thursday, September 27, 2012, Jesse >> > > MacFadyen >> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> I agree in a continuous integration >> > scenario >> > > > that >> > > > > > >>>>>>>makes >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > sense, >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> but >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>we >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> are not there yet, and probably not soon >> > > > either. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Cheers, >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Jesse >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6 >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 12:46 PM, Brian LeRoux >> > > > > > >>>>>>><b...@brian.io> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Ya lets not ship a release with >> different >> > > ver >> > > > > > >>>>>>>numbers >> > > > > > >>>>>>> inside >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>bundled. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> That's askin for (more) issue tracking >> > > hell. A >> > > > > > >>>>>>>release >> > > > > > >>>>>>>tag >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > is >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > just >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>a >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> one >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> liner / automated. If it isn't: it >> should >> > > be. >> > > > :p >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2012, Filip >> > Maj >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> Link fail! >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1531 >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> On 9/26/12 12:22 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen" >> < >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> purplecabb...@gmail.com >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Address which for windows phone? >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Jesse >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6 >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 12:01 PM, Filip Maj >> > > > > > >>>>>>><f...@adobe.com> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> O ya and we should possibly address >> > this >> > > > for >> > > > > > >>>>>>>windows >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > phone >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 7 >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>2.1.1 >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jesse are there any instructions >> > anywhere >> > > > on >> > > > > > >>>>>>>how >> > > > > > >>>>>>>to >> > > > > > >>>>>>>put >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > together >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> those >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> starter packages? >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 9/26/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse >> MacFadyen" >> > < >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > purplecabb...@gmail.com >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I think we should allow some >> latitude >> > in >> > > > the >> > > > > > >>>>>>>point >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> releases >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > to >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> avoid >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> the cascade of meaningless tags, and >> > > extra >> > > > > > >>>>>>>work. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Can we release 2.1.1 and just say >> that >> > > it >> > > > > > >>>>>>>contains >> > > > > > >>>>>>> 2.1.1 >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> for >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>iOS >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> and >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2.1.0 for the rest? There are no API >> > > > changes >> > > > > > >>>>>>>right? >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Jesse >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6 >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 9:54 AM, Michael >> > > Brooks >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> As Becky mentioned, there's some >> big >> > > > issues >> > > > > > >>>>>>>for >> > > > > > >>>>>>>iOS >> > > > > > >>>>>>> and >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> our >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> user's >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> really like to see a quick patch. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd be in favour of tagging 2.1.1, >> > > where >> > > > > iOS >> > > > > > >>>>>>>tags >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > master >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> and >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> every >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> other >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> platform tags 2.1.1 on the same >> > commit >> > > as >> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.0. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Michael >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:59 AM, >> > Brian >> > > > > > >>>>>>>LeRoux < >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> b...@brian.io> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd rather we point 2.1.1 at the >> 2.1 >> > > tag >> > > > > as >> > > > > > >>>>>>> suggested >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> for >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Android, >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> continue work on 2.2 as planned, >> and >> > > > ship >> > > > > a >> > > > > > >>>>>>>fresh >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> release >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > for >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> iOS >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein the big showstopper type >> > > > problems >> > > > > > >>>>>>>exist. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:48 PM, >> Joe >> > > > > Bowser >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>><bows...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should just start >> > cutting >> > > a >> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.2.0 >> > > > > > >>>>>>> release. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > This >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> change >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> log >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> looks too big for a point release >> > and >> > > > > > >>>>>>>there's >> > > > > > >>>>>>> enough >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvements >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> to >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> merit >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That being said, Cordova 2.1.0 >> > still >> > > > > isn't >> > > > > > >>>>>>> officially >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> out, >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> complicates things. Any word on >> > > that? >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 26, 2012 6:33 AM, "Andrew >> > > > Grieve" >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <agri...@chromium.org> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another breakage that has been >> > > coming >> > > > > up a >> > > > > > >>>>>>>lot >> > > > > > >>>>>>>is >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > that >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > the >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> XHR >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bridge >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't work on non file:/// >> hosted >> > > > > paged. >> > > > > > >>>>>>>It's >> > > > > > >>>>>>> fixed >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> now, >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>so >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> would >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> good >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get it out ther >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> -- >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> @purplecabbage >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> risingj.com >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> >> > > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >>
