1603 seems like it isn't our issue. I'll take a look now to see if its a poor interaction with cordova and jQuery mobile, or just straight up jQuery mobile.
-Michal On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > iOS these have been fixed: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600 > > I'm fixing this one: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502 > > This one will be left, don't know if we can fix it: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603 > > I will be updating the version numbers, template etc as well. > > > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> > wrote: > > On the Android side: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1606 (updating core plugins to > > extend CordovaPlugin instead of Plugin) > > > > Update iOS list with already fixed ones gone: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600 > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.be...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> And 1563 is a dup of 902. > >> I'm confused about what the problem is with 1604 (I posted a comment) > >> And think that the following are also important: > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1502 - We need and updated > image > >> - does Adobe have a designer to work on that? > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1600 > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> > wrote: > >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Bugs that I'd like to see fixed before the RC: > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1603 > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1604 > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1570 > >> > > >> > 1570 is already marked closed? > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1563 > >> > > > >> > > We should be able to fix these over the next couple of days though. > >> Want > >> > to > >> > > aim for cutting the RC Thursday? > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Agree that tagging 2.2.0rc1 is the right thing to do at this > point. > >> > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Becky Gibson < > gibson.be...@gmail.com > >> > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > I think we have a pretty good handle on the iOS 6 bugs. Most of > >> the > >> > > ones > >> > > > > reported recently have already been fixed and committed. I > would > >> > push > >> > > > for > >> > > > > a release candidate this week so we can start focusing on > testing > >> and > >> > > bug > >> > > > > fixes rather than continue to add more features and > optimizations. > >> > I > >> > > > > think once we have a release candidate we will get more feedback > >> from > >> > > > users > >> > > > > who are not comfortable taking an edge build. This will get us > more > >> > > real > >> > > > > world iOS 6 testing. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -becky > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Giorgio Natili < > >> > g.nat...@gnstudio.com > >> > > > > >wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Because has been said that some (or most) iOS 6 issues will be > >> not > >> > > part > >> > > > > of > >> > > > > > it... > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On 10/8/12 9:03 AM, "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >Why do you feel that this release wouldn't be a stable > release? > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Giorgio Natili < > >> > > > g.nat...@gnstudio.com> > >> > > > > > >wrote: > >> > > > > > >> Just my 2 cents but you don't think is better to wait 2 > weeks > >> > more > >> > > > and > >> > > > > > >> have a pretty stable one? > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> Giorgio > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> On 10/3/12 7:56 PM, "Simon MacDonald" < > >> > simon.macdon...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>I think we are looking good for 2.2.0 on Android. It will > >> mostly > >> > > be > >> > > > a > >> > > > > > >>>bug fix/performance release for us. I suspect we'll need > until > >> > > 2.3.0 > >> > > > > > >>>to get all the Camera code sorted. > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>>Simon Mac Donald > >> > > > > > >>>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>>On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Bryce Curtis < > >> > > > curtis.br...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > >>>wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>> It sounds like resolving iOS6 issues will drive when > 2.2.0 > >> can > >> > > be > >> > > > > > >>>> tagged. What is the readiness of the other platforms so > we > >> > can > >> > > > > have a > >> > > > > > >>>> 2.2 release when iOS is ready? Does it sound reasonable > to > >> > have > >> > > a > >> > > > > > >>>> release candidate in a week or so, then give a couple of > >> weeks > >> > > of > >> > > > > > >>>> testing before tagging 2.2? > >> > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Filip Maj < > f...@adobe.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>> If you folks see benefit for the iOS implementation, > then > >> I'm > >> > > for > >> > > > > > >>>>>waiting. > >> > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>> On 10/2/12 8:48 AM, "Andrew Grieve" < > agri...@chromium.org> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>I was thinking the same thing. We still have new > >> iOS6-related > >> > > > bugs > >> > > > > > >>>>>>being > >> > > > > > >>>>>>reported, so it might make sense to give this more time. > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Becky Gibson > >> > > > > > >>>>>><gibson.be...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> So, where do we stand on this? I think working > towards > >> 2.2 > >> > > > > sooner > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>rather > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> than later would be the best solution since there > appear > >> to > >> > > be > >> > > > > many > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>issues > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> with cutting a point release. Where do the other > >> platforms > >> > > > stand > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrt > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.2? > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> What more needs to be done? > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> -becky > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Michal Mocny < > >> > > > > mmo...@chromium.org > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > Nevermind, I'm not able to repro the report. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Michal Mocny > >> > > > > > >>>>>>><mmo...@chromium.org> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > someone just reported an issue with FileWriter on > >> ios6 > >> > ( > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1559) > >> similar > >> > > to > >> > > > a > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>FileReader > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > issue I fixed a few weeks back. Fix is likely > easy, > >> > just > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>taking > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>a > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>look > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > right now to confirm and see if any other things > need > >> > > > fixing. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>Should > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> be > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > solved today. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Andrew Grieve > >> > > > > > >>>>>>><agri...@chromium.org > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> The main fixes we'll need are: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Patrick Mueller [ios] route console > >> methods > >> > > to > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>original > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> console commit > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> | commitdiff | tree | snapshot > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Patrick Mueller [ios] route console > >> methods > >> > > to > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>original > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> console commit > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> | commitdiff | tree | snapshot > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Change default > bridge > >> > > from > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> XHR_NO_PAYLOAD > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> to... commit | commitdiff | tree | snapshot > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Attempt to fix a > >> crash > >> > in > >> > > > iOS > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>XHR > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> bridge > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> mode. commit | commitdiff | tree | snapshot > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 2 days ago Andrew Grieve [ios] Fix XHR exec > bridge > >> not > >> > > > > working > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>for > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> non-file... commit | commitdiff | tree | snapsho > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> However, there were also extra params added to > >> > > > FileTransfer > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>that > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>will > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > also > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> need to be included to avoid a JS/Native > mismatch. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> There looks to be some Globalization plugin JS > >> commits > >> > > as > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>well, > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>but I > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> haven't followed whether those will cause issues > if > >> > left > >> > > > > out. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Michael Brooks < > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > mich...@michaelbrooks.ca > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> >wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > When we decide to roll 2.1.1, we should use > JIRA > >> to > >> > > > track > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>the > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> release. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > Unfortunately, that means JIRA spam... > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Filip Maj < > >> > > > f...@adobe.com > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > iOS folks: are there any commits needed newer > >> than > >> > > the > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.0 > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>tag > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> in > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> the > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > JS > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > for any critical fixes? > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > On 9/27/12 3:40 PM, "Jesse MacFadyen" > >> > > > > > >>>>>>><purplecabb...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Just iOS afaik > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Cheers, > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > Jesse > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >Sent from my iPhone6 > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >On 2012-09-27, at 3:36 PM, Filip Maj < > >> > > f...@adobe.com> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> So which platforms are we fixing horrible > >> bugs > >> > > for > >> > > > in > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.1? > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> WP7 > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > + > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > iOS? > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> Basically: do any of the failing platforms > >> that > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>_require_ > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>fixes > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> need > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > any > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> JS fixes? > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> On 9/27/12 3:32 PM, "Jesse" < > >> > > > purplecabb...@gmail.com > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> Where / When are we tagging cordova-js ? > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Jesse > >> > MacFadyen > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Not disagreeing. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Cheers, > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Jesse > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> Sent from my iPhone6 > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> On 2012-09-27, at 2:31 AM, Brian LeRoux > < > >> > > > > b...@brian.io> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> One click builds are not just for CI! > Hand > >> > > > rolling > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>always > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > error > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>prone, > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> and > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> time consuming repatative business like > >> that > >> > > is > >> > > > a > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>job > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>for a > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> robot. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>You > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> then > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> can focus on code, and others can see > (and > >> > > > > therefor > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>improve > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> upon) > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> release > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> packaging. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> Regardless of all those benefits we > want > >> to > >> > > get > >> > > > > to a > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>CI > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > future. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> (recommended reading on this, and more: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > http://pragprog.com/the-pragmatic-programmer) > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> On Thursday, September 27, 2012, Jesse > >> > > MacFadyen > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> I agree in a continuous integration > >> > scenario > >> > > > that > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>makes > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > sense, > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> but > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>we > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> are not there yet, and probably not > soon > >> > > > either. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Cheers, > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Jesse > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6 > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 12:46 PM, Brian > LeRoux > >> > > > > > >>>>>>><b...@brian.io> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Ya lets not ship a release with > >> different > >> > > ver > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>numbers > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> inside > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>bundled. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> That's askin for (more) issue > tracking > >> > > hell. A > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>release > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>tag > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > is > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > just > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>a > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> one > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> liner / automated. If it isn't: it > >> should > >> > > be. > >> > > > :p > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2012, > Filip > >> > Maj > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> Link fail! > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1531 > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> On 9/26/12 12:22 PM, "Jesse > MacFadyen" > >> < > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> purplecabb...@gmail.com > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Address which for windows phone? > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Jesse > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6 > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 12:01 PM, Filip > Maj > >> > > > > > >>>>>>><f...@adobe.com> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> O ya and we should possibly > address > >> > this > >> > > > for > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>windows > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > phone > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> 7 > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>2.1.1 > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jesse are there any instructions > >> > anywhere > >> > > > on > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>how > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>to > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>put > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > together > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> those > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> starter packages? > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 9/26/12 10:04 AM, "Jesse > >> MacFadyen" > >> > < > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > purplecabb...@gmail.com > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I think we should allow some > >> latitude > >> > in > >> > > > the > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>point > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> releases > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > to > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> avoid > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> the cascade of meaningless tags, > and > >> > > extra > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>work. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Can we release 2.1.1 and just say > >> that > >> > > it > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>contains > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> 2.1.1 > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> for > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>iOS > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> and > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2.1.0 for the rest? There are no > API > >> > > > changes > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>right? > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Jesse > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone6 > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-09-26, at 9:54 AM, > Michael > >> > > Brooks > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> <mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> As Becky mentioned, there's some > >> big > >> > > > issues > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>for > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>iOS > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> and > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> our > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> user's > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> would > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> really like to see a quick > patch. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd be in favour of tagging > 2.1.1, > >> > > where > >> > > > > iOS > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>tags > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > master > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> and > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> every > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> other > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> platform tags 2.1.1 on the same > >> > commit > >> > > as > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.1.0. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Michael > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:59 AM, > >> > Brian > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>LeRoux < > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> b...@brian.io> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd rather we point 2.1.1 at > the > >> 2.1 > >> > > tag > >> > > > > as > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> suggested > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> for > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Android, > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> continue work on 2.2 as > planned, > >> and > >> > > > ship > >> > > > > a > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>fresh > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> release > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > for > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> iOS > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wherein the big showstopper > type > >> > > > problems > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>exist. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:48 > PM, > >> Joe > >> > > > > Bowser > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>><bows...@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should just start > >> > cutting > >> > > a > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>2.2.0 > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> release. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > This > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> change > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> log > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> looks too big for a point > release > >> > and > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>there's > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> enough > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvements > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> to > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> merit > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> That being said, Cordova 2.1.0 > >> > still > >> > > > > isn't > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> officially > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> out, > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> complicates things. Any word > on > >> > > that? > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 26, 2012 6:33 AM, > "Andrew > >> > > > Grieve" > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <agri...@chromium.org> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another breakage that has > been > >> > > coming > >> > > > > up a > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>lot > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>is > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > that > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > the > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> XHR > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bridge > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't work on non file:/// > >> hosted > >> > > > > paged. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>It's > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> fixed > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> now, > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>so > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> would > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> good > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to get it out ther > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> -- > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> @purplecabbage > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>> risingj.com > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >