Hey Greg et al. Agreed with you - I called it tonight, it seemed to go well with a half and half crowd. I referred to it as Culver City Becket, a variation of Culver City Contra by James Hutson (excuse me I don't have the author's name in front of me).
Laurie ---- Looking at this dance I have to admit that I am more intrigued by the Beckett version as suggested by David. I like having an easy dance to introduce the idea of the Becket formation. I also like having an easy dance that begins with "long lines forward and back." How should I credit the dance if I call it as a Becket? Is there a standard etiquette for this? How about "Contra Culver City" for the Becket version with switched A and B parts? ************** At 01:49 PM 1/28/2010, you wrote: >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TnURscEvpc&feature=PlayList&p=992537F69CC7EC
