I get the digest. I have two choices. 1. Reply to the digest mailing. This allows me to clip and reference the pertinent comments. Doesn't allow me to change the title.
2. Reply to sharedweight.net. I can title, but no letter text goes with me. I can cut and paste, taking a little extra time. Moderators, is there a rule I missed? Let me know your preferences. Thanks. Keith Tuxhorn Austin On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:00 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Send Callers mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Please use appropriate subject heading (Liz and Bill) > 2. Re: Please use appropriate subject heading (Greg McKenzie) > 3. Re: Compact dances (Lisa Greenleaf) > 4. Re: Please use appropriate subject heading (Martha Edwards) > 5. Re: ONS Dance - Accretion Reel (Laur) > 6. Re: ONS Dance - Accretion Reel (Jack Mitchell) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:06:46 +1300 > From: Liz and Bill <[email protected]> > To: Caller's discussion list <[email protected]> > Subject: [Callers] Please use appropriate subject heading > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hi Folks, > > This is a great forum, and I often search over the past posts. We have > a > few threads > going which have subjects unrelated to their content. "Quadrille Formation > and ONS" > is about dance space. "Callers Digest ... " is uninformative. Please take > care > to change subject when appropriate. Thanks. > > Cheers, Bill > > > >
