Thank you for pointing that out, Bob. I agree with you completely on avoiding conflicting use of terminology. I've been hearing a local caller use the term "slip the clutch" in that one circle dance for 20+ years, and not being a modern square dancer it never crossed my mind that there was a conflict. I can see how he may have been confused, but I will certainly not use it myself in the future.

On 12/4/2011 8:33 AM, Bob Peterson wrote:
Recently someone posted a dance sequence and rather then hijack that thread I'm 
starting a new one.

Right hand turn, Left hand turn
Two hand turn, No hand turn (do-si-do)
Balance and swing
Promenade and slip the clutch (ladies turn right and meet the next gent)
Outside of modern square dancing you can define slip the clutch any way you like, of 
course, but within MSD, a slip the clutch requires both dancers in the couple to already 
be facing in opposite directions. What would be borrowed here from MSD is a "ladies 
rollback while the gents move forward".

What's good here is the definition for this rare contra call is included. 
What's bad is this exactly not the definition in squares. I know slip the 
clutch sounds cooler and is shorter to say.

Its likely this was misobserved, misremembered or a coincidence of invention. 
It could even be a very old definition that diverged in the two dance styles. 
It's still going to (mildly) confuse the handful of people who dance both 
contras and MSD-they'll either mess up or hesitate. I can dance a contra to 
whatever words the caller wants to use as the caller defines it, but if this 
were undefined and sprung on me, say in a medley, I'd do something the contra 
caller did not intend. So again I'm glad the definition is included in the 
choreography.

(Here's and easy reference to the rollback and slip the clutch calls from MSD: 
http://www.mit.edu/~tech-squares/lessons/lesson6.html. There are more precise 
definitions at the callerlab site.)

What do you think?

\bob
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers

Reply via email to