Hi Jim?

Yeah. That's originally what I was aiming for; I've danced contra dances
where they are used as a down-the-hall turnaroynd. The Loop Di Doo differs
in that instead of a turnaround move, it leads into a swing as a
continuation of the move. Actually, if Forward Six changed hands the gent
lifted, it would be the same since a swing follows.

I do believe that's Jack Mitchell in that video.
On Jun 20, 2013 11:14 PM, "James Saxe" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ron,
>
> I think your "Loop Di Doo" figure is a lot like something that
> occurs in some versions of the traditional (not modern western)
> square dance "Forward Six" (a/k/a "Right Hand High, Left Hand Low"
> or "Right Lady Over, Left Lady Under" ...).  See for example these
> videos:
>
>     
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=vaDbKuJNqkM<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaDbKuJNqkM>
>         (watch the action as 2:45)
>
>     
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=ltQg0o_p0SU<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltQg0o_p0SU>
>         (watch at 1:12)
>
> It's not exactly the same, since in the square dance figure it's
> the left hand lady (already holding he partner's hand) who ducks
> under the arch, while the right hand lady arches (rather than
> diving) to get to her lonesome gent.
>
> --Jim
>
> On Jun 20, 2013, at 6:20 PM, Ron T Blechner wrote:
>
>  I wrote a dance that, when I finished it, I realized the A was the
>> same as 3-33,33:
>> http://contradances.tumblr.**com/post/10510984149/ants-**marching<http://contradances.tumblr.com/post/10510984149/ants-marching>
>>
>> It's gone over well, and has an easier finish. There's one move to
>> teach very carefully. (I uh ... sorta created a variation of a
>> left-hand-high-right-hand-low that goes into a swing ... called a Loop
>> Di Doo). It's been picked up by a few other callers, so, I know it's
>> not totally awful.
>>
>> in dance,
>> Ron T Blechner
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Bree Kalb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree with Michael. Especially in the case of a classic.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>
>>>> From: Michael Barraclough 
>>>> <michael@michaelbarraclough.**com<[email protected]>
>>>> >
>>>> Sent: Jun 20, 2013 5:25 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: [Callers] Tampering with a classis aagain 3-33-33
>>>>
>>>> There are thousands of contras.  If one doesn't work, why not try
>>>> another one instead of altering that one?
>>>>
>>>> Michael Barraclough
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 13:16 -0700, Dave C wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Instead of the Ladies Dosido 1.5 at the end to progress, just have the
>>>>> Ladies AL 1 1/2 in the center, with RH ready for the next neighbor.  Some
>>>>> in the caller community have dubbed this version of the dance 3-33-34.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dave Colestock
>>>>> New Cumberland, PA
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --- On Thu, 6/20/13, Kalia Kliban <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Kalia Kliban <[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Callers] Tampering with a classis aagain 3-33-33
>>>>> To: "Caller's discussion list" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Date: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 2:10 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> I've had pretty good luck with it, possibly because I have the women
>>>>> ID the next neighbor early on.  They know which face to look for.  After
>>>>> that, they get a better feel for the area to aim for to find the new
>>>>> neighbor.  A couple of seriously disoriented dancers can really play havoc
>>>>> with this dance though.  It's brittle.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kalia
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/20/2013 11:02 AM, Rickey Holt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 3-33-33 lovers and callers - I have been calling this great dance
>>>>>> recently
>>>>>> and noticed that dancers of various experience levels in several
>>>>>> venues have
>>>>>> had trouble with the transition in the B2 from the Ladies Do-si-do 1
>>>>>> 1/2 to
>>>>>> the balance with the next neighbor that starts the dance.  They have
>>>>>> trouble
>>>>>> finding that next neighbor, even after several times through, and with
>>>>>> translating the momentum of crossing the set to that of up and down
>>>>>> the line
>>>>>> of the first part of the dance. I tried substituting an allemande
>>>>>> right 1
>>>>>> 1/2 for the do-si-do 1 1/2 of the original with little effect.  What
>>>>>> about a
>>>>>> ladies allemande right about 1 1/2 to a next neighbor allemande left
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> then starting the dance again with a balance by the right with that
>>>>>> neighbor?  Other solutions?  Have you or your dancers noticed the
>>>>>> problem
>>>>>> that I have seen.  As always, thanks for your thoughts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rickey Holt
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>> Callers mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers>
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>> Callers mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> Callers mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bree Kalb, LCSW
>>> 301 W. Weaver St.
>>> Carrboro, NC 27510
>>> 919-932-6262 ext 216
>>> http://www.**thewellnessalliance.com/**BreeKalb.html<http://www.thewellnessalliance.com/BreeKalb.html>
>>>
>>> Regarding the Use of Email -- Please Note: Although I use a firewall and
>>> my
>>> computer is password protected, my emails are not encrypted. Therefore, I
>>> cannot guarantee confidentiality of email communication. If you choose to
>>> communicate confidential information with me via email, I will assume
>>> that
>>> you have made an informed decision and I will view it as your agreement
>>> to
>>> take the risk that email may be intercepted. Please be aware that email
>>> is
>>> never an appropriate vehicle for emergency communication.  If you are
>>> canceling an appointment less than 48 hours in advance, please
>>> also leave me a voice mail message at my office.
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Callers mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers>
>>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Callers mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Callers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers>
>

Reply via email to