I disagree with the general concept of teaching by the regular dancers, during
the dance or walk-thru. I absolutely encourage helpful eye contact, proffered
hands, body language, friendly waves ("its me, here I am") by all to all, but
'teaching' in the sense of doing what the caller is or should be doing...no.
Greg Mackenzie says that regular dancers like to teach a much as does the
caller. It is my contention that among the several agendas a contra dance
"regular" might have when going to a dance, teaching is not one. I think the
main agenda is to dance as much and as seamlessly as possible with whomever (
no preconception about dancing only with experienced folks) and to this end,
folks hope the caller has done their homework and can explain the moves so
clearly that additional 'teaching' from the floor is unnecessary. In the
minority, there may be a few regulars who are compelled to tell others what to
do, or more benignly, just try to be helpful with verbal or physical
instruction.
Here's a worst case scenario. Cpl B in the minor set isn't catching on to the
ladies chain....man A walks across to teach them how its done...while he is
doing so the caller has 2 choices Stop calling/teaching while one person in
the hall instructs 2 others in the hall or keep calling....lets say caller
goes with the latter option and calls "and balance and swing a new neighbor".
Cpl B is engaged in being taught the previous move...they are out of place and
out of time. Man A is over teaching cpl B: he's out of place and out of time;
Next female neighbor for Man B has no one to balance. Instant set breakdown.
Even on a less dramatic scale, verbal instruction is best done by one person.
Historically this has been the caller. Historically, it has worked for a long
time. "Duelling teaching" is very disorienting to most newcomers..they want to
listen to the caller but feel its impolite to ignore the 'experienced' person
in their face. It is also disrespectful to the caller.
________________________________
From: Greg McKenzie <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]; Caller's discussion list
<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Callers] First-time Contra Dancers and similar figures
Alan wrote:
> I totally agree that we need to rely on and empower experienced dancers to
> teach figures. What I'm talking about however is newcomers who seemed to
> have learned the figure in the walkthrough losing it after the dance starts
> and apparently unable to receive any input from caller or other dancers,
> and what can be done about that.
My apologies. I was not being clear in addressing your question. Earlier
Alan wrote:
> This is likelier to happen if both partners are new, and likeliest to
>> happen if all four in that set are new. But that couple that's new will
>> have that problem repeatedly. When I see that I continue to prompt the
>> figures, maybe with more emphasis - Ladies CHAIN and COURTESY TURN - and
>> it doesn't seem to make any difference.
>>
>
What I was trying to say is that this problem seems to be rooted in the
fact that your hall was not integrated. If all first-timers were paired
with a regular then your situation would be a very different one.
Instead of focusing on tactics to teach multiple couples of paired
first-timers from the mike I am suggesting that we address the root cause
which is the fact that the hall is not integrated.
Obviously, this is more difficult when there are already couples of
first-timers paired with each other. But being pro-active in your efforts
to integrate the hall would solve the root problem for your next gig and
would set a different tone that will allow you to demonstrate to the
regulars that partnering with first-timers is very gratifying and fun.
This is not, by the way, a long-term "problem" that lives in the "local
dance culture." Any caller who can call precisely and clearly using
effective word-order can set a tone that immediately makes it clear that
the regulars have a vital role to play in welcoming and leading newcomers
through the figures. This is what makes contras a "traditional" dance
form. The regulars show the first-timers how it's done...not the caller.
Thank you Donna and JoLaine for your ideas about integration.
JoLaine wrote:
> I often hear callers tell the newbies to find experienced dancers. That's
> like telling a drowning person to go find a lifeguard!
>
This is a good point. But there are some subtle factors to keep in mind
when speaking on mike that can make it more effective to speak directly to
the first-timers. If you tell the regulars to pair up with first-timers
you are sending out some subtle implied messages with negative consequences:
- You will be indicating that you feel the regulars either do not know that
there are first-timers in the room...or worse you will be indicating that
you believe the regulars are not inclined to dance with first-timers and
must be told to do so from the mike.
This point will not be lost on the first-timers themselves, who are likely
to assume that the regulars are not fond of dancing with first-timers (why
else would the caller have to tell them to do it?).
I prefer to address the first-timers directly and assume the full support
of the regulars. The regulars already know who the first-timers are. And
the first-timers need to know that it is the custom that regulars will
partner with them. (The regulars already know this.) I begin my evening
by saying:
"If you are new to this kind of dancing please find someone who has danced
for at least one night. I will tell you everything you need to know and
your more experienced partner will show you all of the moves."
This is a subtle point but it has to do with "leading by assumption." If
you assume the support of the regulars you will get more support than by
ordering them from the mike. The "at least one night" phrase authorizes
everyone in the room--except first-timers--to partner with first-timers,
and this makes the task seem much more manageable because there are many
dancers who can help.
Just a thought,
Greg McKenzie
West Coast, USA
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
