I have a big circle mixer I really like, I'm not sure who wrote it or the name 
of it, perhaps if someone else recognizes it they can help me out there. I just 
call it the Balance and Pass mixer so I know what it is.

A1) Balance and Swing Partner
A2) Promenade for 8, Twirl Promenade for eight. (See explanation below)
B1) Balance your partner, pass by the next,
         Balance the next, pass by the next, 
B2) Balance the next, pass by the next
         Do si do the next, (this is your new partner)

 
The  promenade is for 8 counts in Varsovienne position, at which point the man 
raises his right hand and the woman twirls beneath his hand as they continue 
moving forward for another 8 counts, ending with the woman facing around the 
circle in the opposite direction from the man, with their right hands still 
joined. For the balances, start with your partner balance, then pull by partner 
and walk past the next person you meet. Balance the next, pull by and skip one 
again, repeat, then finally do-si-do the one you meet.

It's a fun and energetic dance, people usually get it quickly.


I also wrote a big circle mixer inspired by one of Ted Sanella's, and it works 
pretty well:

Ted's Waves
A1) Forward and back
        Women go forward, return facing out to form a wave, partner in right 
hand
A2) Balance the wave, allemande partner 1X
        Balance the wave, allemande left neighbor 1X
B1) Do si do partner
        Swing the same neighbor
B2) Promenade the set

Martha

On Sep 27, 2013, at 6:26 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> Send Callers mailing list submissions to
>       [email protected]
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       [email protected]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       [email protected]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: Favorite mixers? (Laur)
>   2. Re: Favorite mixers? (rich sbardella)
>   3. Re: Favorite mixers? (Robert Livingston)
>   4. Re: norms/ethics of choreography sharing (Jeff Kaufman)
>   5. Re: Dances licensed with CC or similar (Jeff Kaufman)
>   6. Re: Easy Dance List (Michael Fuerst)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Laur <[email protected]>
> To: Caller's discussion list <[email protected]>,      Caller's
>       discussion list <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Favorite mixers?
> Message-ID:
>       <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> 
> 
> MINE TOO!!!
> 
> I use EZ's mixer for any event - great for ONS to introduce moves without 
> teaching...?
> esp for weddings and well, community events.
> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Jack Mitchell <[email protected]>
>> To: Caller's discussion list <[email protected]> 
>> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 10:55 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Callers] Favorite mixers?
>> 
>> 
>> Two of my favorites are:
>> 
>> *Esmerelda's Revenge* -- Beth Parkes Mixer
>> 
>> *A1*Forward and Back
>> All go forward, gents back up (ladies stay in the middle)
>> to have a ring of ladies inside the ring of gents
>> 
>> *A2*Ladies turn Left, Gents turn Right
>> single file Promenade around the ring
>> Everyone turn back
>> look for your partner -- last one you swung
>> 
>> *B1*P DsD
>> N Alle L 1x
>> 
>> *B2*Pass P**by**R
>> Swing the next (new Partner)
>> 
>> 
>> *Ease About Mixer *-- Gene Hibert (var. by Cis Hinkle)Mixer
>> 
>> *A1*B&S
>> 
>> *A2*Promenade
>> As a couple swoop into center and back
>> 
>> *B1*Ladies weave the ring -- in front, behind, between
>> Ring forward and back
>> 
>> *B2*Gents weave the ring -- in front, behind, between
>> Original P Alle L 1? to new partner
>> ? ? ? ? ? ?  Note: Once you meet your original Partner, look past them 
>> to see who your new partner is.? For some reason there is frequent 
>> disorientation when getting out of the allemande and trying to find new 
>> partner**
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 9/26/2013 6:47 PM, Kalia Kliban wrote:
>>> I'd love to add a few more mixers to my repertoire.? Which ones do you 
>>> like for beginning groups or for early in the evening?? And do you 
>>> have some that more advanced groups can enjoy?
>>> 
>>> Kalia
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Callers mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Callers mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>> 
>> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 21:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
> From: rich sbardella <[email protected]>
> To: Caller's discussion list <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Favorite mixers?
> Message-ID:
>       <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> Here is a very simple mixer.? On a wood floor a two hand swing would be 
> better.? I adapted this from a dance called by Steve Holland.
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCu3ZGOIpRo
> Rich 
> Stafford, CT
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Kalia Kliban <[email protected]>
> To: Caller's discussion list <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:47 PM
> Subject: [Callers] Favorite mixers?
> 
> 
> I'd love to add a few more mixers to my repertoire.? Which ones do you like 
> for beginning groups or for early in the evening?? And do you have some that 
> more advanced groups can enjoy?
> 
> Kalia
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 22:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Robert Livingston <[email protected]>
> To: rich sbardella <[email protected]>,  Caller's discussion list
>       <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Favorite mixers?
> Message-ID:
>       <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> I believe this works so well because there is not a new prompt? for
> each phrase - only four items or calls...(treating dosado/swing as a
> single action with a new partner.) 
> 
> Bob Livingston
> Middletown, CT
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: rich sbardella <[email protected]>
> To: Caller's discussion list <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 12:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Favorite mixers?
> 
> 
> Here is a very simple mixer.? On a wood floor a two hand swing would be 
> better.? I adapted this from a dance called by Steve Holland.
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCu3ZGOIpRo
> Rich 
> Stafford, CT
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Kalia Kliban <[email protected]>
> To: Caller's discussion list <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 6:47 PM
> Subject: [Callers] Favorite mixers?
> ? 
> 
> I'd love to add a few more mixers to my repertoire.? Which ones do you like 
> for beginning groups or for early in the evening?? And do you have some that 
> more advanced groups can enjoy?
> 
> Kalia
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:11:30 -0400
> From: Jeff Kaufman <[email protected]>
> To: "Caller's discussion list" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] norms/ethics of choreography sharing
> Message-ID:
>       <CAK36jCOH+cKQPC8P_UDU6+gYqeMkk2=v8xsaylfzhcy-rj8...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> Tavi wrote:
>> regarding to calling a CC BY-NC dance at a paid
>> event: is it in fact noncommercial use?
> 
> Sounds commercial to me.  The text from the license is:
> 
> "You may not exercise any of the rights granted to You in Section 3
> above in any manner that is primarily intended for or directed toward
> commercial advantage or private monetary compensation." --
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode
> 
> I think the relevant right would be to "Publicly Perform the Work".
> You're getting paid to call, so "directed toward private monetary
> compensation" sounds applicable.
> 
> Jeff
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:18:52 -0400
> From: Jeff Kaufman <[email protected]>
> To: "Caller's discussion list" <[email protected]>,    David
>       Casserly <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Dances licensed with CC or similar
> Message-ID:
>       <CAK36jCOxtZ6-OVCoCXYcsYEwyQY736J9_ytC7uiBA=f+hcz...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Dave Casserly
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I do not think Dan is correct that dance choreography is not copyrightable.
>> Dan, I don't know where you got that information, but nothing I know about
>> copyright law gives me that impression.  I guess you could argue that
>> contra dances are not sufficiently "original," but the standard for
>> originality is so low in copyright law that I don't think that would be a
>> winning argument, or even close to it.
>> 
> 
> I read more about this, and it looks like a social dance might not
> qualify as a "dramatic work".
> 
>    On the other hand, if your dance is not a ?dramatic work? because it
>    is not a choreographic show, does not tell a story or is not part of a
>    dramatic performance, it is not protected.
>      -- 
> http://www.copyright.org.au/admin/cms-acc1/_images/15356429875239252b8737e.pdf
> 
> They conclude "In our view, it is unlikely that social dances will be
> protected by copyright."
> 
> I wrote a blog post: http://www.jefftk.com/p/can-you-copyright-a-contra-dance
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Michael Fuerst <[email protected]>
> To: Gloria Johnson <[email protected]>,    Caller's discussion
>       list <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Easy Dance List
> Message-ID:
>       <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> Hello Gloria
> 
> Here is a link to the file I promised, downloadable, and readable by any word 
> processor
> There is also a link to dances I have written.
> Email me ?if you have trouble accessing them or questions about any of the 
> dances contained in the two files
> http://aptsg.org/Dance/dance_links.html
> 
> ?
> Michael Fuerst ? ? ?802 N Broadway ? ? ?Urbana IL 61801?????? 217-239-5844
> Links to photos of many of my drawings and paintings are 
> at?www.ArtComesFuerst.com
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Gloria Johnson <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 6:11 PM
> Subject: [Callers] Easy Dance List
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> Michael,
> I, too, would like a copy of your list of easy dances. ?Thanks!
> 
> Gloria Johnson Scarlet
> Springfield, MO? 
> 
> ?>> From: Michael Fuerst <[email protected]>
>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 7:58 PM
>>> Subject: [Callers] Easy dance List
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I have sent the list of easy dances I have collected to he 23 people? 
>>> who requested such.
>>> If you have not received it by Monday, email me.
>>> Make sure to check your trash ans spam folders, in case it ended up? 
>>> there.
>>> 
>>> Michael Fuerst? ? ? 802 N Broadway? ? ? Urbana IL 61801? ? ? ? 
>>> 217-239-5844
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> 
> 
> End of Callers Digest, Vol 109, Issue 49
> ****************************************

Reply via email to