Could you explain what it means to "vote people up?" It sounds like one would have to be "voted up" to be able to comment. I'm not sure I would call any of the discussions I've read flooded.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Lindsay Morris <[email protected]>wrote: > Today its 29 hate-the-idea, 7 like-it, 7 not sure. I'll let it go. > > Really, all I wanted was a way we could vote people up, so we could give > more weight to the opinions of the especially respected folks here (and > filter the email flood down to just those people). > > I wonder if there's any other way to do that? > > -------------------- > Lindsay Morris > CEO, TSMworks > Tel. 1-859-539-9900 > [email protected] > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Aahz Maruch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014, John W Gintell wrote: > > > > > > A potential solution would be to replace it with a Google Group. > > > People can choose to receive messages via email (digest or not) or > > > view it as a group, or both. An advantage is that if you want to > > > revisit a discussion it is easier. > > > > You can revisit discussions here using the archives. And even before the > > Snowden revelations, I already avoided Google as much as possible. > > > > Honestly, it sounds like solutions in search of a problem. > > -- > > Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 > > http://rule6.info/ > > <*> <*> <*> > > Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html > > _______________________________________________ > > Callers mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers > > > _______________________________________________ > Callers mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers >
