More discussion on contra dance copyrightability, which I didn't
include before because I didn't want to send us off into legal land:
http://www.jefftk.com/p/can-you-copyright-a-contra-dance


On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Mark Jones via Callers
<[email protected]> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mark Jones <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Giant dance database?
> To: Maia McCormick <[email protected]>
>
>
> This is a GIANT project.
>
> People associated with CDSS have had thoughts of undertaking such a
> database.  Nils Fredland had initiated a start to the idea about four
> or five years ago, but it is not clear if it has a prime mover right
> now.
>
> Copyright:
> In the US, "social dance steps" are not considered copyrightable, but
> the concept has not been tested in court. This idea that "social dance
> steps" are not copyrightable is a part of the legislative history of
> the 1980 US copyright revision, but NOT a part of the actual statute.
> Any dance published in the US before the copyright law change in 1980
> is in the public domain absolutely, as no dance IN THE US was
> copyrightable, unless "an integral part of a (copyrightable) play".
> I predict the law will be settled after some exercise class instructor
> successfully (or fails to) successfully win a suit against someone for
> copying their "social dance steps" outside of class.  It seems to me
> the ony population that desires to restrict the use of social dance
> steps instruction would be exercise instructors, and yoga instructors,
> and the like that have an investment in maintaining the secrecy of
> their choreography, since they have paying population attending for
> their secret "social dance steps".
>
> Copyright laws in all other countries are unique to that country, and
> typically much stricter and more favorable to the composer /
> choreographer, for social dance.
>
> Issues for the database and searching include that one must create a
> canonical form of all of the entered dances, since nearly every contra
> dance move is capable of being described in more than one way, hence a
> disaster for searching and parsing moves in a collective way.
>
> I can speak from experience about creating a cannonical version of a
> dance, as a co-collaborator of Larry Jennings's compilation, "Give and
> Take" [1],  that it takes a lot of effort to make the dances uniform,
> so that they can be properly searched, and that was done for the
> dances collected in his book, some times to the consternation of the
> authors that permitted their dance to be collected and published in
> the book.
>
> The conclusion others have come to for such a project, in terms of
> cannonical searchable versions, is to have the original dance text
> married to a cannonical "uniformized" version that may be searchable
> in comparison to other dances.
>
> [1] http://www.neffa.org/give_and_take.html
>
> ~Mark Jones
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Maia McCormick via Callers
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm currently in programming school casting about for programming projects,
>> and I had the idea of a giant searchable contradance database, where you can
>> filter by move combination, etc.
>>
>> My question: is this something people would be interested in having? Or does
>> it run the risk of infringing on intellectual property, or shortchanging
>> dance writers on book sales, etc.? (Obviously no dances would be included
>> without the author's permission, but it may be that making a huge ton of
>> dances freely available and searchable in one place online would be a death
>> blow to published books of dances, or have some other negative effect I'm
>> not foreseeing right now...)
>>
>> Anyway: does anyone have any thoughts on this project?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Maia
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Callers mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net

Reply via email to