Sorry I was unclear. Because some contra callers say “mad robin” and some 
contra callers say “double mad robin,” meaning the same thing, and if you’ve 
learned it as “mad robin” and a new-to-you caller says “double mad robin,” 
you’ll think it’s a different figure.

> On Sep 28, 2018, at 8:51 AM, Folk Dance <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I don't think the distinction is necessary is it?  "mad robin with your 
> neighbour" is clearly distinct from "1s in the middle mad robin" so why add 
> double mad robin?  It'd be like calling most petronella's double petronellas 
> because they have four people moving but the original petronella is for 1s 
> only.
> 
> Bob
> 
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:29 PM Read Weaver via Callers 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
> wrote:
> It’s perhaps worth saying during the teaching “also called a double mad 
> robin,” since dancers will sometimes hear that (from callers who know ECD). 
> I’ve seen confusion on moderately experienced contra dancers’ faces (and 
> feet) at the term “double mad robin” (thinking you go around twice, or that 
> it involves more than 4 people) because they’ve only ever seen the figure 
> with 4 people moving and they’ve only ever heard it called “mad robin.”
> (In the English country dance “Mad Robin,” only two people are moving in the 
> eponymous figure.)

_______________________________________________
List Name:  Callers mailing list
List Address:  [email protected]
Archives:  https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to