whoops - further consideration, i admit I don't know an easy way! seems straightforward though, if you just explain the simple mechanism of going out and then coming back in it doesn't seem complicated. I would make sure to say how far around the star should go, who is in the lead going out and then who is in the lead going back in.
________________________________ From: Callers <callers-boun...@lists.sharedweight.net> on behalf of Julia Whiteneck via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net> Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 5:43 PM To: Callers@Lists.Sharedweight.net Subject: Re: [Callers] How would you teach this? What would you call it? looks like a star into a slide left ________________________________ From: Callers <callers-boun...@lists.sharedweight.net> on behalf of Luke Donforth via Callers <callers@lists.sharedweight.net> Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 4:30 PM To: Callers@Lists.Sharedweight.net Subject: [Callers] How would you teach this? What would you call it? Hi All, I'm playing around with choreographing triplets, and I've got a sequence that I think would flow well; but I'm not sure how to teach it short of a demo. The idea is that couples 2 & 3 do a star. Out of that star, they move out, up, and back in; leaving space in the middle for couple 1 to move to the bottom. I put together an animation of it: https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/292197780/ Is that already a defined move? What would you call it? How would you teach it? Thanks for your thoughts! -- Luke Donforth luke.donfo...@gmail.com<mailto:luke.do...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ List Name: Callers mailing list List Address: Callers@lists.sharedweight.net Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/
