On Wednesday, June 8, 2011 21:18:49 Pierre Stirnweiss wrote: > Well, sounds really really familiar. They could have attended our sprint and > spared the discussion time, couldn't they? ;)
if someone had documented it and shared it on kde-core-devel and proposed it for wider adoption, then perhaps yes. is it safe to state, then, that this is the workflow that calligra is using today? (sorry, i just follow discussions here and build it every so often; i'm not involved in actual day-to-day devel :) -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
