On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Cyrille Berger <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:01:13PM +0200, Jos van den Oever wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 21:18:49 PM Pierre Stirnweiss wrote: > > > Well, sounds really really familiar. They could have attended our > sprint > > > and spared the discussion time, couldn't they? ;) > > > IIRC this very workflow was already discussed in Oslo. > > > > I'll believe it when I see 0 failing tests and all document > round-tripping > > without errors. ;-) > > > > Seriously, I think we can get there if we set up a system where a patch > can go > We have discussed this at the last sprint in Berlin, the idea is that > developers commit in master, and the buildbot validate the commits, and if > the tests are passing they are migrated to a "master-validated" branch. And > if master does not pass the test suite, the migration is blocked until the > problem is solved, either by a fix, or by reverting the bad commit. > > And I am actually (slowly) working on the setup right now. > Any help needed in setting up a windows buildbot (if at all possible)? Pierre
_______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
